Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
It was initially established by statute in 1891 and was reestablished in its current form in 1970 [1] by the Colorado General Assembly under Article VI, Section 1 of the Constitution of Colorado. [2] The Colorado Court of Appeals was first abolished in 1905, then reinstated in 1913, and abolished again in 1917.
(Reuters) -Alphabet's Google asked a U.S. appeals court on Wednesday to throw out a jury verdict and a judge's order forcing it to revamp its app store Play. In its first detailed argument to the ...
United States ex rel. Polansky v. Executive Health Resources, Inc., 599 U.S. ___ (2023), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that in a qui tam action filed under the False Claims Act, the United States may move to dismiss whenever it has intervened — whether during the seal period or later on.
On July 10, 2014, a day after the ruling in Brinkman, the Twentieth Judicial District denied the state attorney general's motion in Colorado ex rel. Suthers. District Court Judge Andrew Hartman found that while the Boulder clerk violated the law— There is little argument that Clerk Hall is engaging in a form of civil disobedience.
Get AOL Mail for FREE! Manage your email like never before with travel, photo & document views. Personalize your inbox with themes & tabs. You've Got Mail!
The fixed rate for a 15-year mortgage is 6.10%, up 8 basis points from last week's average 6.02%. These figures are lower than a year ago, when rates averaged 7.22% for a 30-year term and 6.56% ...
How to follow the 10-3-2-1-0 sleep rule 10 hours before bed: No more caffeine. While there’s some variation in the genetics of how different people process caffeine, 10 hours is a reasonable gap ...
United States ex rel. Schutte v. Supervalu Inc. , 598 U.S. ___ (2023), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the False Claims Act 's scienter element, which requires a defendant to "knowingly" give a "false" claim to the government, refers to a defendant's knowledge and subjective beliefs.