enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Impartiality - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Impartiality

    Impartiality (also called evenhandedness or fair-mindedness) is a principle of justice holding that decisions should be based on objective criteria, rather than on the basis of bias, prejudice, or preferring the benefit to one person over another for improper reasons.

  3. Recusal - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recusal

    Recusal laws and guidelines are established in various legal systems worldwide, including the United States, where they are regarded as cornerstones of judicial impartiality. [ 2 ] [ 3 ] The concept of recusal dates back to ancient legal systems and has evolved to address contemporary ethical standards and legal complexities.

  4. Judicial misconduct - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judicial_misconduct

    Judicial misconduct occurs when a judge acts in ways that are considered unethical or otherwise violate the judge's obligations of impartial conduct.. Actions that can be classified as judicial misconduct include: conduct prejudicial to the effective and expeditious administration of the business of the courts (as an extreme example: "falsification of facts" at summary judgment); using the ...

  5. Supreme Court Chief Justice Roberts issues warning on ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/supreme-court-chief-justice-roberts...

    Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts issued a warning on Tuesday that the United States must maintain "judicial independence" just weeks away from President-elect Donald Trump's inauguration ...

  6. 7 in 10 Americans think Supreme Court justices put ideology ...

    www.aol.com/news/7-10-americans-think-supreme...

    A solid majority of Americans say Supreme Court justices are more likely to be guided by their own ideology rather than serving as neutral arbiters of government authority, a new poll finds, as ...

  7. Adversarial system - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adversarial_system

    Judges in an adversarial system are impartial in ensuring the fair play of due process, or fundamental justice.Such judges decide, often when called upon by counsel rather than of their own motion, what evidence is to be admitted when there is a dispute; though in some common law jurisdictions judges play more of a role in deciding what evidence to admit into the record or reject.

  8. Secret recording of Justice Samuel Alito raises questions ...

    www.aol.com/news/secret-recording-justice-samuel...

    A secretly recorded conversation with Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito is now calling into question his impartiality in politically fraught cases before the nation's highest court.

  9. Natural justice - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_justice

    A public authority has a duty to act judicially whenever it makes decisions that affect people's rights or interests, and not only when it applies some judicial-type procedure in arriving at decisions. [13] The basis on which impartiality operates is the need to maintain public confidence in the legal system.