Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
[185] [186] [187] The Supreme Court upheld the state's redistricting plan in 2018. [188] The Texas Legislature passed boundaries for itself in 2011, but the Justice Department denied them preclearance. A federal court in San Antonio implemented interim maps for the 2012 elections, which somewhat closely followed the legislature's initial maps.
The 2003 Texas redistricting was a controversial intercensus state plan that defined new congressional districts. In the 2004 elections , this redistricting supported the Republicans taking a majority of Texas 's federal House seats for the first time since Reconstruction .
The reason for this arrangement stems from the controversial 2003 Texas redistricting plan which was ruled unconstitutional with respect to the 23rd district by the Supreme Court in League of United Latin American Citizens v. Perry. The Court ruled that the plan was a racial gerrymander; specifically that it lowered the Hispanic population ...
Republicans under House Majority Leader Tom DeLay (R-Texas) and state House Speaker Tom Craddick (R) pushed through partisan redistricting — breaking up competitive, majority-minority districts ...
The Department of Justice sued Texas over new redistricting maps Monday, saying the plans discriminate against voters in the state’s booming Latino and Black populations. The lawsuit, filed in ...
The lawsuit notes that the vast majority of Texas’ population growth over the past decade came from Black, Latino and Asian people, but the new maps that state Republicans drew doesn’t give ...
The judges determined that the state had not been able to prove that the redistricting plan was developed without intentional discrimination. [7] Due to timing with the 2012 elections to be held in November, Texas continued to use the Texas federal district court-derived maps. During these events, the Supreme Court ruled in Shelby County v.
Congressional redistricting fell to the courts in Balderas v. State of Texas after no special session was called to address redistricting. [ 5 ] [ 6 ] While the court's initial map appeared to benefit Republicans, [ 7 ] the final maps ordered for the 2002 elections were seen as beneficial to Democrats.