Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The Cambridge Journal of Economics, founded in the traditions of Marx, Keynes, Kalecki, Joan Robinson and Kaldor, welcomes contributions from heterodox economics as well as other social science disciplines. Find out more.
The Cambridge Journal of Economics, founded in the traditions of Marx, Keynes, Kalecki, Joan Robinson and Kaldor, welcomes contributions from heterodox economics as well as other social science disciplines.
Fundamental implications of the neglect of servicisation by development economists. Adam Fforde. Cambridge Journal of Economics, Volume 48, Issue 5, September 2024, Pages 889–908, https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/beae023. Abstract.
We encourage papers that pay attention to using fit-for-purpose theory to explain and predict real-world outcomes. Policy implications of the analyses are also welcome. Indicative sub-topics include but are not exhausted by the following issues: Marshall, neoclassical, and evolutionary economics.
The Cambridge Journal of Economics, founded in the traditions of Marx, Keynes, Kalecki, Joan Robinson and Kaldor, welcomes contributions from heterodox economics as well as other social science disciplines. Within this orientation the journal provides a focus for theoretical, applied, interdisciplinary, history of thought and methodological ...
The Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society is an international multi-disciplinary journal publishing refereed papers on the spatial dimensions of contemporary socio-economic-political change.
When submitting your manuscript, please enter your manuscript data into the relevant fields, following the detailed instructions at the top of each page. You may like to have the original word-processing file available so you can copy and paste the title and abstract into the required fields.
Cambridge Journal of Economics, Volume 41, Issue 2, 1 March 2017, Pages 349–365, https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/bew043
This introduction to the special issue on the future of work and working time offers an overview of issues of relevance to present-day debates on working time.
We assemble a large database of countries’ manufacturing employment and output shares for 1970–2010. We ask whether increased global competition and labor-displacing technological change have made it more difficult for countries to industrialize in employment, and whether there are alternative routes to prosperity.