Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The Cambridge Journal of Economics, founded in the traditions of Marx, Keynes, Kalecki, Joan Robinson and Kaldor, welcomes contributions from heterodox economics as well as other social science disciplines. Find out more.
The Cambridge Journal of Economics, founded in the traditions of Marx, Keynes, Kalecki, Joan Robinson and Kaldor, welcomes contributions from heterodox economics as well as other social science disciplines.
Asymmetrical, symmetrical and artifactual man: group size and cooperation in James Buchanan’s constitutional economics. Alain Marciano and John Meadowcroft. Cambridge Journal of Economics, Volume 48, Issue 5, September 2024, Pages 823–842, https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/beae030. Abstract. View article.
Uncertainty and general equilibrium: an evaluation of Professor Knight’s contributions to economics Get access. Geoffrey T F Brooke and Lydia Cheung. Cambridge Journal of Economics, Volume 45, Issue 5, September 2021, Pages 901–918, https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/beab022. Abstract.
The Cambridge Journal of Economics, founded in the traditions of Marx, Keynes, Kalecki, Joan Robinson and Kaldor, welcomes contributions from heterodox economics as well as other social science disciplines. Within this orientation the journal provides a focus for theoretical, applied, interdisciplinary, history of thought and methodological ...
Read the latest Editor's Choice articles from Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society. Each article has been hand-picked and highlighted as outstanding research in the journal, and they are freely available to read online.
When submitting your manuscript, please enter your manuscript data into the relevant fields, following the detailed instructions at the top of each page. You may like to have the original word-processing file available so you can copy and paste the title and abstract into the required fields.
We encourage papers that pay attention to using fit-for-purpose theory to explain and predict real-world outcomes. Policy implications of the analyses are also welcome. Indicative sub-topics include but are not exhausted by the following issues: Marshall, neoclassical, and evolutionary economics.
This introduction to the special issue on the future of work and working time offers an overview of issues of relevance to present-day debates on working time.
By this intrinsic relationship between innovation and uncertainty, more complex modes of behaviour which include ‘potential surprises’ become relevant (see e.g., Shackle, 1949). The focus on novelties and uncertainty is thus the most important distinguishing mark of Neo-Schumpeterian Economics.