Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
In a 2021 preprint article, Argyri Panezi argued that the case "presents two important, but separate questions related to the electronic access to library works; first, it raises questions around the legal practice of digital lending, and second, it asks whether emergency use of copyrighted material might be fair use" and argued that libraries ...
Lawsuit Subject of lawsuit Court of decision Year of decision AT&T Mobility v. Concepcion: contracts that exclude class action arbitration: Supreme Court of the United States: 2011 Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. Dabit: SLUSA preempting state law class action claims: Supreme Court of the United States: 2006 West v. Randall
The HathiTrust Digital Library (HTDL) is a spin-off of the Google Books Library Project. It was founded in 2008 by the Committee on Institutional Cooperation and the University of California system. [8] The collections of these university libraries were digitized by Google and then combined by HTDL.
The CDL concept has not been tested in courts, and a lawsuit against the Open Library for copyright infringement was initiated by four publishers in June 2020. [67] This case, Hachette v. Internet Archive, was heard in the Southern District of New York. On March 25, 2023, the court ruled against the Internet Archive. [68] [69]
Facebook recently paid 1.4 million Illinois residents $397 in 2022 as part of a class action lawsuit for facial recognition breaches through its “Tag Suggestions” feature, per CNBC.
Cuneiform tablet case for record of a lawsuit ca. 20th–19th century B.C. Lists of lawsuits cover various types of lawsuits . They are organized by topics and fields, and by individual companies or people.
Law Enforcement officers stand at the steps of the U.S. Supreme Court on July 11, 2022 in Washington, DC. Activists with NextGen America placed chrysanthemums in front of the U.S. Supreme Court to ...
US federal courts have jurisdiction over an action initiated by an American company, against an American citizen infringing on that company's trademark rights, if the citizen's operations and their effects are not confined within the territorial limits of a foreign country. Dairy Queen, Inc. v. Wood: 369 U.S. 469: April 30, 1962: 7–0 Procedural