Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Graphs of functions commonly used in the analysis of algorithms, showing the number of operations N as the result of input size n for each function. In theoretical computer science, the time complexity is the computational complexity that describes the amount of computer time it takes to run an algorithm.
Created independently in 1977 by W. Eddy and in 1978 by A. Bykat. Just like the quicksort algorithm, it has the expected time complexity of O(n log n), but may degenerate to O(n 2) in the worst case. Divide and conquer, a.k.a. merge hull — O(n log n) Another O(n log n) algorithm, published in 1977 by Preparata and Hong. This algorithm is also ...
It is shown that finding an isomorphism for n-vertex graphs is equivalent to finding an n-clique in an M-graph of size n 2. This fact is interesting because the problem of finding a clique of order (1 − ε)n in a M-graph of size n 2 is NP-complete for arbitrarily small positive ε. [43] The problem of homeomorphism of 2-complexes. [44]
Here, complexity refers to the time complexity of performing computations on a multitape Turing machine. [1] See big O notation for an explanation of the notation used. Note: Due to the variety of multiplication algorithms, M ( n ) {\displaystyle M(n)} below stands in for the complexity of the chosen multiplication algorithm.
Therefore, the time complexity, generally called bit complexity in this context, may be much larger than the arithmetic complexity. For example, the arithmetic complexity of the computation of the determinant of a n × n integer matrix is O ( n 3 ) {\displaystyle O(n^{3})} for the usual algorithms ( Gaussian elimination ).
It is possible to find the maximum clique, or the clique number, of an arbitrary n-vertex graph in time O (3 n/3) = O (1.4422 n) by using one of the algorithms described above to list all maximal cliques in the graph and returning the largest one. However, for this variant of the clique problem better worst-case time bounds are possible.
To show that NL is contained in C, we simply take an NL algorithm and choose a random computation path of length n, and execute this 2 n times. Because no computation path exceeds length n, and because there are 2 n computation paths in all, we have a good chance of hitting the accepting one (bounded below by a constant).
DBSCAN executes exactly one such query for each point, and if an indexing structure is used that executes a neighborhood query in O(log n), an overall average runtime complexity of O(n log n) is obtained (if parameter ε is chosen in a meaningful way, i.e. such that on average only O(log n) points are returned).