Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
For example, if a notable person has a website, then the website does not "inherit" notability from its owner. In such cases, it is often best to describe the website in the article about the notable person. Similarly, a website may be notable, but the owners or authors do not "inherit" notability due to the web content they wrote.
An extensive set of subject-specific guideline pages for different aspects of notability can be found at Category:Wikipedia notability guidelines, with subject specific essays and proposed guidelines at Category:Wikipedia notability. Wikipedia's article on Notability in the English Wikipedia. For commentary and discussion of this guideline, see ...
Some commercial organizations meet Wikipedia notability guidelines but care must be taken in determining whether they are truly notable and whether the article is an attempt to use Wikipedia for free advertising. Wikipedia editors should not create articles on commercial organizations for the purpose of overtly or covertly advertising a company.
As the Wikipedia community has grown, its rules have in turn become more complex, a trend known as instruction creep. [5] This trend is reflected in the development and increasing complexity of the notability guidelines, with various special notability guidelines being proposed for specific topic areas, including notability criteria for porn stars.
On Wikipedia, notability is a test used by editors to decide whether a given topic warrants its own article. For people, the person who is the topic of a biographical article should be "worthy of notice" [1] or "note" [2] —that is, "remarkable" [2] or "significant, interesting, or unusual enough to deserve attention or to be recorded" [1] within Wikipedia as a written account of that person ...
Wikipedia's notability requirement is perhaps the most confusing of all of Wikipedia's core requirements and guidance. The system mostly works, but is very difficult to fully understand or explain. Lack of recognition of how it actually works presents a roadblock to progress and clarification in this area.
Wikipedia defines this process for a topic to become a stand-alone article as notability, and provides a general guideline to determine if the article should be included in Wikipedia. In addition to this general notability guideline, additional guidelines have been created that give further guidance on notability for specific topics.
Wikipedia is an encyclopaedia, but saying that doesn't mean much - it doesn't say what belongs on Wikipedia. The official guidance is a mix of WP:Notability to say what belongs there and WP:NOT to say what doesn't. But those are full of Wikipedian Jargon - and there's a reason WP:OMGWTFBBQ leads to a page. This short essay is to cut through the ...