Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Violent crime rate per 100k population by state (2023) [1] This is a list of U.S. states and territories by violent crime rate. It is typically expressed in units of incidents per 100,000 individuals per year; thus, a violent crime rate of 300 (per 100,000 inhabitants) in a population of 100,000 would mean 300 incidents of violent crime per year in that entire population, or 0.3% out of the total.
The following table of United States cities by crime rate is based on Federal Bureau of Investigation Uniform Crime Reports (UCR) statistics from 2019 for the 100 most populous cities in America that have reported data to the FBI UCR system. [1] The population numbers are based on U.S. Census estimates for the year end.
2014 Calendar Year Ratios of Crime Per 100,000 Population; City State Population Violent Crime Murder and nonnegligent manslaughter Rape Robbery Aggravated assault Property crime Burglary Larceny-theft Motor vehicle theft Alameda: California 75,467 212.0 1.3 11.91 106.0 92.8 2,507.1 392.2 1,723.9 390.9 Albany: Georgia 78,512 1,035.5 5.1 34.4 ...
In cities with at least 100,000 residents, property crime rates are 36% greater than average. At the same time, though, 27% of these 190 cities — including New York — have crime rates that don ...
In 2008, there were 415,810 crimes reported in the U.S. state of North Carolina, including 605 murders. [1] In 2014, there were 318,464 crimes reported, including 510 murders. [1] Between 2003 and 2012, there were an average of 15,255 vehicle thefts per year in North Carolina. [2]
Timeline of U.S. homicide rate. FBI and CDC. [3] [4] Homicide rate by county. CDC. 2014 to 2020 data. [5] This is a list of U.S. states and territories by intentional homicide rate. It is typically expressed in units of deaths per 100,000 individuals per year; a homicide rate of 4 in a population of 100,000 would mean 4 murders a year, or 0.004 ...
The murder rate fell by 26.4%, reported rapes decreased by 25.7%, robberies fell by 17.8%, aggravated assault fell by 12.5%, and the overall violent crime rate went down by 15.2%, the statistics show.
When this linear assumption does not hold, rates per capita still have population effects. In these nonlinear cases, per capita rates can inflate or deflate the representation of crime in cities, introducing an artifactual bias into rankings. Therefore, it is necessary to test for linearity before comparing crime rates of cities of different sizes.