Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
According to consequentialist theories, what people ought to do is determined only by whether their actions will bring about the best. By contrast, Ross argues that maximising the good is only one of several prima facie duties (prima facie obligations) which play a role in determining what a person ought to do in any given case.
[5] [6] This is not because people have come to think that J.S. Mill satisfies the property that Anscombe thought was distinctive of modern consequentialists, and that W.D. Ross does not; [5] rather, it is because the meaning of the word "consequentialism" has changed over time. [5] [6]
In moral philosophy, deontological ethics or deontology (from Greek: δέον, 'obligation, duty' + λόγος, 'study') is the normative ethical theory that the morality of an action should be based on whether that action itself is right or wrong under a series of rules and principles, rather than based on the consequences of the action. [1]
Bernard Williams has argued that consequentialism is alienating because it requires moral agents to put too much distance between themselves and their own projects and commitments. Williams argues that consequentialism requires moral agents to take a strictly impersonal view of all actions, since it is only the consequences, and not who ...
Ross's deontological pluralism was a true innovation and provided a plausible alternative to Kantian deontology. [2] His ethical intuitionism found few followers among his contemporaries but has seen a revival by the end of the 20th and the beginning of the 21st century.
I think that’s part of our attraction for her. We’ve kept this bond with sort of a family she didn’t have.” Liza: A Truly Terrific Absolutely True Story is currently playing in select ...
Donald Trump praises Elon Musk, but vows to end America's electric vehicle mandate ‘on Day 1’ — rejects hydrogen cars because ‘they blow up’ Jing Pan October 12, 2024 at 3:55 AM
Moral objectivism is the view that what is right or wrong does not depend on what anyone thinks is right or wrong, [21] but rather on how it affects people's well-being. . Moral objectivism allows for moral codes to be compared to each other through a set of universal f