Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Show that the sequence $(an)_{n \in \mathbb N}$ is increasing using induction. Hot Network Questions Alternative to regular printed circuit board base material that can be cut by hand / with scissors / cutter
Mathematical induction's validity as a valid proof technique may be established as a consequence of a fundamental axiom concerning the set of positive integers (note: this is only one of many possible ways of viewing induction--see the addendum at the end of this answer).
First, most students do not really understand why mathematical induction is a valid proof technique. That's part of the problem. Second, weak induction and strong induction are actually logically equivalent; thus, differentiating between these forms of induction may seem a little bit difficult at first.
I am stuck on this question from the IB Cambridge HL math text book about Mathematical induction. I am sorry about the bad formatting I am new and have no idea how to write the summation sign. Using mathematical induction prove that the $$\sum^n_{k=1} k2^k =(n-1)(2^{n+1})+2$$ [correction made]
Since n + m n + m is even it can be expressed as 2k 2 k, so we rewrite n + (m + 2) n + (m + 2) to 2k + 2 = 2(k + 1) 2 k + 2 = 2 (k + 1) which is even. This completes the proof. To intuitively understand why the induction is complete, consider a concrete example. We will show that 8 + 6 8 + 6 is even using a finite inductive argument.
Hint: prove inductively that a product is > 1 if each factor is > 1. Apply that to the product n! 2n = 4! 245 26 27 2 ⋯ n 2. This is a prototypical example of a proof employing multiplicative telescopy. Notice how much simpler the proof becomes after transforming into a form where the induction is obvious, namely: a product is > 1 if all ...
One should prove mathematical induction based on the self-evident proposition that every set of natural numbers has a least element. I have found that students immediately understand the truth of that proposition whereas they do not immediately understand the principle of mathematical induction.
Proofs should start with " Proof. " or a similar delineation. (This is, at least, standard since the 1950s or so.) Induction steps should start with " Induction step. " or a similar delineation. "Since" starts a dependent clause, which cannot constitute a whole sentence by itself.
Proving Alternating Harmonic Series with Mathematical Induction. 0. Basic mathematical induction question. 0.
I am a CS undergrad and I'm studying for the finals in college and I saw this question in an exercise list: Prove, using mathematical induction, that $2^n > n^2$ for all integer n greater tha...