Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The political rhetoric of Donald Trump, the president of the United States from 2017 to 2021, has been examined in an extensive body of reporting and analysis by linguists, political scientists, and others. [ 1] Generally categorized as populist, emotional, and antagonistic, Trump's style of rhetoric has been identified as a central reason ...
The fallacy of composition is an informal fallacy that arises when one infers that something is true of the whole from the fact that it is true of some part of the whole. A trivial example might be: "This tire is made of rubber; therefore, the vehicle of which it is a part is also made of rubber." This is fallacious, because vehicles are made ...
Tu quoque (appeal to hypocrisy) Logic. Logical fallacy. Whataboutism or whataboutery (as in "what about....?") is a pejorative for the strategy of responding to an accusation with a counter-accusation instead of a defense against the original accusation.
Sometimes it is interpreted as a splitting or a false dilemma, which is an informal fallacy. Some see the statement as a way of persuading others to choose sides in a conflict which does not allow the position of neutrality. [2] Only when there are no alternatives like a middle ground does the phrase hold validity as a logical conclusion. The ...
The argument from authority is a logical fallacy, [ 2] and obtaining knowledge in this way is fallible. [ 3][ 4] However, in particular circumstances, it is sound to use as a practical although fallible way of obtaining information that can be considered generally likely to be correct if the authority is a real and pertinent intellectual ...
Argument from ignorance (from Latin: argumentum ad ignorantiam), also known as appeal to ignorance (in which ignorance represents "a lack of contrary evidence"), is a fallacy in informal logic. The fallacy is committed when one asserts that a proposition is true because it has not yet been proven false or a proposition is false because it has ...
Begging the question. In classical rhetoric and logic, begging the question or assuming the conclusion ( Latin: petītiō principiī) is an informal fallacy that occurs when an argument's premises assume the truth of the conclusion. Historically, begging the question refers to a fault in a dialectical argument in which the speaker assumes some ...
During and after his term as President of the United States, Donald Trump made tens of thousands of false or misleading claims. The Washington Post ' s fact-checkers documented 30,573 false or misleading claims during his presidential term, an average of about 21 per day. [ 1 ][ 5 ][ 6 ][ 7 ] The Toronto Star tallied 5,276 false claims from ...