Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
That Trump would love to turn the calm of the courtroom into something like a campaign rally — is regrettable, but no reason to keep the cameras out. Bill Cotterell: Why Trump trials should be ...
E. Jean Carroll v. Trump, 2019–2024, a concluded suit regarding sexual assault and defamation; New York v. Trump et al, 2019–2024, a concluded suit regarding fraudulently misrepresenting the value of real estate; Thompson v. Trump, 2021–present, ongoing suit alleging responsibility for the January 6 United States Capitol attack
A U.S. policy prohibits cameras in federal court. But House Democrats, legal experts and even one of the former president’s own lawyers want that to change.
Kimmel then put up on the screen a social media post by Eric Trump — the only family member on hand for the verdict reading — which read, “May 30, 2024 might be remembered as the day Donald ...
Trump was indicted on state charges in a March 2023 indictment in New York. He faced 34 criminal charges of falsifying business records in the first degree related to payments made to Stormy Daniels before the 2016 presidential election. [19] [23] The trial began on April 15, 2024; Trump was found guilty on all 34 counts on May 30, 2024. [24]
People v. Trump Court New York Supreme Court Full case name The People of the State of New York v. Donald J. Trump Submitted March 30, 2023 Started April 15, 2024 Decided May 30, 2024 Verdict Guilty on all counts Charge First-degree falsifying business records (34 counts) Citation IND-71543-23 Case history Subsequent action Sentence of unconditional discharge Court membership Judge sitting ...
As diligent as the correspondents have been in relating back to us what they saw in that courtroom, it is not the same as judging for ourselves, writes David Zurawik.
If you were to dream up a hypothetical case that demanded cameras in federal courts, it would be United States of America v. Donald J. Trump. Every American voter will have a unique and pressing ...