Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
This is standard practice in journals, and does not make any claim of novelty. [1] In Wikipedia articles this does not constitute original research and is perfectly permissible – in fact, encouraged – provided that anyone who reads and understands the references can easily see how the material in the Wikipedia article can be inferred.
Since then, there has been a push for English language arts (ELA) teachers, especially at the secondary level, to help students develop close-reading strategies. Several of the ELA standards for reading literature require students to be able to cite direct textual evidence, and to analyze words in context.
When new text is inserted into a paragraph, make sure it is supported by the existing or a new source. For example, when editing text originally reading The sun is pretty big. Notes ^ Miller, Edward. The Sun. Academic Press, 2005, p. 1. an edit that does not imply that the new material is supported by the same reference is The sun is pretty big.
xkcd webcomic titled "Wikipedian Protester". The sign says: "[CITATION NEEDED]".[1]A citation is a reference to a source. More precisely, a citation is an abbreviated alphanumeric expression embedded in the body of an intellectual work that denotes an entry in the bibliographic references section of the work for the purpose of acknowledging the relevance of the works of others to the topic of ...
INCITE: Cite your sources in the form of an inline citation after the phrase, sentence, or paragraph in question. INTEXT: Add in-text attribution whenever you copy or closely paraphrase a source's words. INTEGRITY: Maintain text–source integrity by placing inline citations in a way that makes clear which source supports which part of the text.
Citations are important in Wikipedia to ensure that information comes from actual, reliable sources (WP:V, WP:CITE). There are three preferred ways of citing sources: Footnotes; Footnotes with list-defined references; Shortened footnotes
In both articles and discussions, it is highly advisable to cite specific evidence. In articles, this helps the veracity of statements. In articles, this helps the veracity of statements. In discussions, specific evidence helps get your point across more effectively, while also serving to prevent flame wars from erupting from a misconstrued ...
The reader can find the in-text author–date citations of a specific work more easily. Finding in-text numbered citations is more difficult because some will not appear if they are included in ranges. The author–date method can be more convenient for manuscript/draft preparation, or revisions, that are handled by multiple contributing authors.