enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Is–ought problem - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Is–ought_problem

    Hume discusses the problem in book III, part I, section I of his book, A Treatise of Human Nature (1739): In every system of morality, which I have hitherto met with, I have always remarked, that the author proceeds for some time in the ordinary way of reasoning, and establishes the being of a God, or makes observations concerning human affairs; when of a sudden I am surprised to find, that ...

  3. Fact–value distinction - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fact–value_distinction

    It is generally regarded that Hume considered such derivations untenable, and his 'is–ought' problem is considered a principal question of moral philosophy. [5] Hume shared a political viewpoint with early Enlightenment philosophers such as Thomas Hobbes (1588–1679) and John Locke (1632–1704). Specifically, Hume, at least to some extent ...

  4. An Enquiry Concerning the Principles of Morals - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/An_Enquiry_Concerning_the...

    Clearly, Hume thought that there were grave misunderstandings at the time as to what counts as virtue versus vice. For example, Hume attempts to defend, contrary to many religious teachings, that a certain amount of luxury, even pride, is virtuous. Hume makes important distinctions in his classifications of virtues.

  5. Naturalistic fallacy - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naturalistic_fallacy

    The term naturalistic fallacy is sometimes used to label the problematic inference of an ought from an is (the is–ought problem). [3] Michael Ridge relevantly elaborates that "[t]he intuitive idea is that evaluative conclusions require at least one evaluative premise—purely factual premises about the naturalistic features of things do not entail or even support evaluative conclusions."

  6. Values (Western philosophy) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Values_(Western_philosophy)

    The problem in philosophy of moving from an "is" to an "ought" (the "Is-ought problem") is said to have been introduced into philosophy by David Hume. Richmond Campbell, in discussing this, asks how one might move from a knowledge of what exists, i.e. from a whole range of possible values, to a knowledge of which, among these, one ought to ...

  7. Category:Humeanism - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Humeanism

    This list may not reflect recent changes. Humeanism * David Hume; C. Humean definition of causality; H. Hume's fork; I. Is–ought problem

  8. The Missing Shade of Blue - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Missing_Shade_of_Blue

    Recognise that Hume believed the problem to be a genuine counter-example; Recognise that Hume included the example for a purpose; Provide an explanation that harmonizes well with other features of Hume's epistemology. The problem has been tackled in various ways:

  9. Problem of induction - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Problem_of_induction

    David Hume, a Scottish thinker of the Enlightenment era, is the philosopher most often associated with induction. His formulation of the problem of induction can be found in An Enquiry concerning Human Understanding, §4. Here, Hume introduces his famous distinction between "relations of ideas" and "matters of fact".