enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Software walkthrough - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Software_walkthrough

    In software engineering, a walkthrough or walk-through is a form of software peer review "in which a designer or programmer leads members of the development team and other interested parties through a software product, and the participants ask questions and make comments about possible errors, violation of development standards, and other problems". [1]

  3. Informal methods of validation and verification - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Informal_methods_of...

    A review is similar to a walkthrough or inspection except review team also includes management. A review is an overview of the whole model process including coverage of the guidelines and specifications, with the goal to assure management that the simulation development includes all concept objectives.

  4. Agile testing - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agile_testing

    Agile testing is a software testing practice that follows the principles of agile software development.Agile testing involves all members of a cross-functional agile team, with special expertise contributed by testers, to ensure delivering the business value desired by the customer at frequent intervals, working at a sustainable pace.

  5. Software inspection - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Software_inspection

    Peer reviews are considered an industry best-practice for detecting software defects early and learning about software artifacts. Peer Reviews are composed of software walkthroughs and software inspections and are integral to software product engineering activities. A collection of coordinated knowledge, skills, and behaviors facilitates the ...

  6. Code review - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Code_review

    Code review (sometimes referred to as peer review) is a software quality assurance activity in which one or more people examine the source code of a computer program, either after implementation or during the development process. The persons performing the checking, excluding the author, are called "reviewers".

  7. Software review - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Software_review

    The most obvious value of software reviews (especially formal reviews) is that they can identify issues earlier and more cheaply than they would be identified by testing or by field use (the "defect detection process") [citation needed]. The cost to find and fix a defect by a well-conducted review may be one or two orders of magnitude less than ...

  8. Comprehensive & Robust Requirements Specification Process

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comprehensive_&_Robust...

    The Comprehensive & Robust Requirements Specification Process (CRRSP), or CRRSP (pronounced crisp), is a methodology for gathering, defining, and validating software requirements. CRRSP is not a step-by-step restrictive process, but an adaptable framework, intended to be customized by the Business Analysis teams that select the elements of the ...

  9. Software peer review - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Software_peer_review

    When performed as part of each Software development process activity, peer reviews identify problems that can be fixed early in the lifecycle. [1] That is to say, a peer review that identifies a requirements problem during the Requirements analysis activity is cheaper and easier to fix than during the Software architecture or Software testing ...