enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Kisela v. Hughes - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/?title=Kisela_v._Hughes&redirect=no

    2017 term per curiam opinions of the Supreme Court of the United States#Kisela v. Hughes; Retrieved from " ...

  3. 2017 term per curiam opinions of the Supreme Court of the ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2017_term_per_curiam...

    The Supreme Court of the United States handed down sixteen per curiam opinions during its 2017 term, which began October 2, 2017, and concluded September 30, 2018. [1] ...

  4. List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 584

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States...

    This is a list of all the United States Supreme Court cases from volume 584 of the United States Reports: . Note: As of August 2024, final bound volumes for the U.S. Supreme Court's United States Reports have been published through volume 579.

  5. KSR International Co. v. Teleflex Inc. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/KSR_International_Co._v...

    On April 30, 2007, the Supreme Court unanimously reversed the judgment of the Federal Circuit, holding that the disputed claim 4 of the patent was obvious under the requirements of 35 U.S.C. §103, and that in "rejecting the District Court’s rulings, the Court of Appeals analyzed the issue in a narrow, rigid manner inconsistent with §103 and our precedents," referring to the Federal Circuit ...

  6. Kirksey v. Kirksey - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kirksey_v._Kirksey

    Kirksey v. Kirksey , Ala. Sup. 8 Ala. 131 (1845), was a case decided by the Supreme Court of Alabama that held that a promise by a man, Issac Kirksey, to give his sister-in-law a house if she would move to his land was not a valid contract because it lacked bargained-for- consideration .

  7. United Mine Workers of America v. Gibbs - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Mine_Workers_of...

    United Mine Workers of America v. Gibbs, 383 U.S. 715 (1966), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that in order for a United States district court to have pendent jurisdiction over a state-law cause of action, state and federal claims must arise from the same "common nucleus of operative fact" and the plaintiff must expect to try them all at once. [1]

  8. HuffPost Data

    projects.huffingtonpost.com/projects

    Poison Profits. A HuffPost / WNYC investigation into lead contamination in New York City

  9. Lexmark International, Inc. v. Static Control Components, Inc.

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lexmark_International,_Inc...

    Argument: Oral argument: Case history; Prior: 697 F.3d 387 (6th Cir. 2012); cert. granted, 569 U.S. 1017 (2013).: Holding; Judgment AFFIRMED. Static Control's alleged injuries—lost sales and damage to its business reputation—fall within the zone of interests protected by the Lanham Act, and Static Control sufficiently alleged that its injuries were proximately caused by Lexmark's ...