enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. United States v. Davis (2019) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Davis_(2019)

    18 U.S.C. § 924(c) contains both an “elements clause” and a “residual clause.” [8] The elements clause defines an offense as a crime of violence if it “has as an element the use, attempted use, or threatened use of physical force against the person or property of another,” and the residual clause defines an offense as a crime of violence if it, “by its nature, involves a ...

  3. List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 588

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States...

    Note: As of August 2024, final bound volumes for the U.S. Supreme Court's United States Reports have been published through volume 579. Newer cases from subsequent future volumes do not yet have official page numbers and typically use three underscores in place of the page number; e.g., Snyder v.

  4. File:Davis v. United States (2020).pdf - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Davis_v._United...

    This file is a work of an officer or employee of the Supreme Court of the United States, taken or made as part of that person's official duties. As a work of the U.S. federal government , the file is in the public domain in the United States.

  5. Davis v. United States (1973) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Davis_v._United_States_(1973)

    Davis v. United States, 411 U.S. 233 (1973), was a 1973 United States Supreme Court case concerning criminal procedure and collateral attacks on criminal convictions. The majority opinion, authored by then-Associate Justice William Rehnquist, held that when claims of unconstitutional jury discrimination are brought on postconviction collateral review, they are subject to the timeliness ...

  6. Davis v. United States (1994) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Davis_v._United_States_(1994)

    Davis v. United States, 512 U.S. 452 (1994), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court established that the right to counsel can only be legally asserted by an "unambiguous or unequivocal request for counsel." [1] Legal scholars have criticized this case stating that the "bright line" rule established under Edwards v.

  7. Davis v. United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Davis_v._United_States

    Davis v. United States, 589 U.S. ___ (2020), a per curiam opinion; Davis v. United States, 564 U.S. 229 (good-faith exception to the exclusionary rule) Davis v. United States, 512 U.S. 452 (invocation of the right to counsel under Miranda) Davis v. United States, 495 U.S. 472 (charitable deductions under §170 of the Internal Revenue Code ...

  8. United States v. Davis - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Davis

    United States v. Davis may refer to: United States v. Davis, a U.S. Supreme Court opinion on tax treatment of divorce settlements; United States v. Davis, an 11th Circuit ruling on the need for a warrant to obtain cell phone location data; United States v. Davis, a U.S. Supreme Court opinion on the residual clause of the Hobbs Act

  9. List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 397

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States...

    Case name Citation Date decided United States v. Kordel: 397 U.S. 1: 1970: United States v. Reynolds (1970) 397 U.S. 14: 1970: Czosek v. O'Mara: 397 U.S. 25