Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Honest services fraud is a crime defined in 18 U.S.C. § 1346 (the federal mail and wire fraud statute), added by the United States Congress in 1988, [1] which states "For the purposes of this chapter, the term scheme or artifice to defraud includes a scheme or artifice to deprive another of the intangible right of honest services."
One intangible form of property recognized under the mail and wire fraud statutes is the right to control the disposition of government funds. [63] In 1983, Curato et al. noted that: [F]ederal courts and prosecutors are now realizing the potential uses for the mail fraud statute in combating political corruption.
Mail fraud was first defined in the United States in 1872. 18 U.S.C. § 1341 provides: Whoever, having devised or intending to devise any scheme or artifice to defraud, or for obtaining money or property by means of false or fraudulent pretenses, representations, or promises, or to sell, dispose of, loan, exchange, alter, give away, distribute, supply, or furnish or procure for unlawful use ...
Schmuck v. United States, 489 U.S. 705 (1989), is a United States Supreme Court decision on criminal law and procedure.By a 5–4 margin it upheld the mail fraud conviction of an Illinois man and resolved a conflict among the appellate circuits over which test to use to determine if a defendant was entitled to a jury instruction allowing conviction on a lesser included charge.
After Young's defense attorney claimed that the government did not believe in its case, the prosecutor encouraged the jury to convict Young by reminding them of Compton Petroleum's false invoices and financial incentive to commit fraud. The jury found Young guilty of mail fraud and false statement charges, but he was acquitted of interstate ...
In light of increased mail theft and identity fraud, the U.S. Postal Service has taken several steps. impact. One is called Informed Delivery , a digital service you can sign up for to know what ...
McNally v. United States, 483 U.S. 350 (1987), was a case in which the United States Supreme Court decided that the federal statute criminalizing mail fraud applied only to the schemes and artifices defrauding victims of money or property, as opposed to those defrauding citizens of their rights to good government.
United States v. Warshak, 631 F.3d 266 (6th Cir. 2010) is a criminal case decided by the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit holding that government agents violated the defendant's Fourth Amendment rights by compelling his Internet service provider (ISP) to turn over his emails without first obtaining a search warrant based on probable cause.