Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Pennsylvania v. Mimms, 434 U.S. 106 (1977), is a United States Supreme Court criminal law decision holding that a police officer ordering a person out of a car following a traffic stop and conducting a pat-down to check for weapons did not violate the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution.
433 U.S. 186 (1977) Quasi in rem jurisdiction and minimum contacts: Bates v. State Bar of Arizona: 433 U.S. 350 (1977) First Amendment constraints on advertising by lawyers Nixon v. Administrator of General Services: 433 U.S. 425 (1977) Papers of President Nixon: Zacchini v. Scripps-Howard Broadcasting Co. 433 U.S. 562 (1977)
Case name Citation Date decided New Hampshire v. Maine: 434 U.S. 1: 1977: Arlington County Board v. Richards: 434 U.S. 5: 1977: Dump Truck Owners Ass'n v. Pub. Util ...
Mimms (1975), in which the Court held that the unlawful possession charges as well as the relevant convictions and sentences against Harry Mimms over his illicit possession and concealed carry of an unlicensed firearm must be vacated and his case should be remanded for a new trial with the suppression of evidence due to violations of his Fourth ...
L. Linmark Associates, Inc. v. Township of Willingboro; List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 429; List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 430
Maryland v. Wilson , 519 U.S. 408 (1997), was a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States . The Court held that officers could order passengers out a car during a traffic stop, extending Pennsylvania v.
Michigan Dept. of State Police v. Sitz , 496 U.S. 444 (1990), was a United States Supreme Court case involving the constitutionality of police sobriety checkpoints . The Court held 6-3 that these checkpoints met the Fourth Amendment standard of "reasonable search and seizure."
Barnes v. Felix is a pending United States Supreme Court case on excessive force claims under the Fourth Amendment. [1] [2] The court will decide whether courts should apply the “moment of the threat” doctrine, which looks only at the narrow window in which a police officer's safety was threatened to determine whether his actions were reasonable, in evaluating claims that police officers ...