enow.com Web Search

Search results

1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network

2. Ring size - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ring_size

   Ring sizes can be measured physically by a paper, plastic, or metal ring sizer (as a gauge) or by measuring the inner diameter of a ring that already fits. Ring sticks are tools used to measure the inner size of a ring, and are typically made from plastic, delrin, wood, aluminium, or of multiple materials. Digital ring sticks can be used for ...

3. Boxing ring - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boxing_ring

   The name "ring" is a relic from when contests were fought in a roughly drawn circle on the ground. The name ring continued with the London Prize Ring Rules in 1743, which specified a small circle in the centre of the fight area where the boxers met at the start of each round. The first square ring was introduced by the Pugilistic Society in 1838.

4. Body jewelry sizes - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Body_jewelry_sizes

   But with body jewelry, there is a wide variety of possible sizes, and wearers generally want jewelry that is the same size as their piercing site. Some wearers want increasingly larger sizes to deliberately stretch the hole. So that wearers can choose the size they want, there are standards for body jewelry sizes, used by jewelry makers and ...

5. Ring (jewellery) - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ring_(jewellery)

   Ruby ring. A ring is a round band, usually made of metal, worn as ornamental jewelry.The term "ring" by itself denotes jewellery worn on the finger; when worn as an ornament elsewhere, the body part is specified within the term, e.g., earrings, neck rings, arm rings, and toe rings.

6. AOL Mail

   mail.aol.com/?icid=aol.com-nav

   Get AOL Mail for FREE! Manage your email like never before with travel, photo & document views. Personalize your inbox with themes & tabs. You've Got Mail!

7. Talk:Ring size - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Ring_size

   However, I've seen many sites claim that a US size 0 is 11.53mm, not 11.63. I've seen other pages that list it as ring_diameter = 11.54 + 0.83 * ring size, which more closely agrees with the size 0 number. On the other hand, a linear regression of this chart results in 11.634 + .8136 x ring_size. It's all over the place, and the charts don't ...