enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Alexandrian text-type - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alexandrian_text-type

    In textual criticism of the New Testament, the Alexandrian text-type is one of the main text types. It is the text type favored by the majority of modern textual critics and it is the basis for most modern (after 1900) Bible translations. Over 5,800 New Testament manuscripts have been classified into four groups by text type.

  3. Bible version debate - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bible_version_debate

    The New Testament has been preserved in more manuscripts than any other ancient work, creating a challenge in handling so many different texts when performing these comparisons. The King James Version (or Authorized Version) was based on the Textus Receptus , an eclectic Greek text prepared by Erasmus based primarily on Byzantine text Greek ...

  4. Textual criticism of the New Testament - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Textual_criticism_of_the...

    Most modern New Testament translations now use an Eclectic Greek text (UBS5 and NA 28) that is closest to the Alexandrian text-type. The United Bible Societies's Greek New Testament (UBS5) and Nestle-Aland (NA 28) are accepted by most of the academic community as the best attempt at reconstructing the original texts of the Greek NT. [26]

  5. Comparison of codices Sinaiticus and Vaticanus - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_codices...

    Codex Sinaiticus and Codex Vaticanus, two of the great uncial codices, representatives of the Alexandrian text-type, are considered excellent manuscript witnesses of the text of the New Testament. Most critical editions of the Greek New Testament give precedence to these two chief uncial manuscripts, and the majority of translations are based ...

  6. Source criticism (biblical studies) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Source_criticism_(biblical...

    Source criticism, in biblical criticism, refers to the attempt to establish the sources used by the authors and redactors of a biblical text. It originated in the 18th century with the work of Jean Astruc, who adapted the methods already developed for investigating the texts of classical antiquity (in particular, Homer's Iliad) to his own investigation into the sources of the Book of Genesis. [1]

  7. A Plain Introduction to the Criticism of the New Testament

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Plain_Introduction_to...

    prol. — contains prolegomena before the several books [2]: 142 Table of ancient and modern divisions of the New Testament, on page 58 of the 1st edition. In every later edition of the Plain Introduction this system of abbreviations was expanded (e.g. Αναγ., Argent., etc.).

  8. Textual variants in the Gospel of John - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Textual_variants_in_the...

    The Effect of Early Christological Controversies on the Text of the New Testament", Oxford University Press, New York - Oxford, 1996, pp. 223–227. Bruce M. Metzger, "A Textual Commentary on the Greek New Testament: A Companion Volume to the United Bible Societies' Greek New Testament", 1994, United Bible Societies, London & New York.

  9. Form criticism - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Form_criticism

    Form criticism as a method of biblical criticism classifies units of scripture by literary pattern and then attempts to trace each type to its period of oral transmission. [1] [failed verification] "Form criticism is the endeavor to get behind the written sources of the Bible to the period of oral tradition, and to isolate the oral forms that went into the written sources.