enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Universal City Studios, Inc. v. Corley - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Universal_City_Studios...

    Both the district and circuit court rulings were controversial, and have been widely criticized by free speech advocates such as the American Civil Liberties Union and the Electronic Frontier Foundation, as well as the American Library Association, the author of The Boondocks, [13] and others, due to upholding legal restrictions on expressive programming code.

  3. Sony Corp. of America v. Universal City Studios, Inc. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sony_Corp._of_America_v...

    Universal City Studios, Inc., 464 U.S. 417 (1984), also known as the " Betamax case ", is a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States which ruled that the making of individual copies of complete television shows for purposes of time shifting does not constitute copyright infringement, but can instead be defended as fair use. [1][2] The ...

  4. United States v. Paramount Pictures, Inc. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Paramount...

    Sherman Antitrust Act; 15 U.S.C. § 1, 2. United States v. Paramount Pictures, Inc., 334 U.S. 131 (1948) (also known as the Hollywood Antitrust Case of 1948, the Paramount Case, or the Paramount Decision), was a landmark United States Supreme Court antitrust case that decided the fate of film studios owning their own theatres and holding ...

  5. Dissenting opinion - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dissenting_opinion

    Legal andjudicial opinions. A dissenting opinion (or dissent) is an opinion in a legal case in certain legal systems written by one or more judges expressing disagreement with the majority opinion of the court which gives rise to its judgment. Dissenting opinions are normally written at the same time as the majority opinion and any concurring ...

  6. Kimble v. Marvel Entertainment, LLC - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kimble_v._Marvel...

    Kimble v. Marvel Entertainment, LLC, 576 U.S. 446 (2015), is a significant decision of the United States Supreme Court for several reasons. One is that the Court turned back a considerable amount of academic criticism of both the patent misuse doctrine as developed by the Supreme Court and the particular legal principle at issue in the case.

  7. Argumentum e contrario - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argumentum_e_contrario

    In logic, an argumentum e contrario (Latin: 'argument from the contrary'; also a contrario or ex contrario[1]), also known as appeal from the contrary, denotes any proposition that is argued to be correct because it is not disproven by a certain case. It is the opposite of the analogy. When analogy is allowed, e contrario is forbidden and vice ...

  8. Mootness - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mootness

    Adequate and independent state ground. v. t. e. The terms moot, mootness and moot point are used in both English and American law, although with different meanings. In the legal system of the United States, a matter is "moot" if further legal proceedings with regard to it can have no effect, or events have placed it beyond the reach of the law.

  9. Argument in the alternative - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument_in_the_alternative

    In regards to contract law, arguing in the alternative is done where a dispute arises over the terms of a contract. In a particular case it may be best for the plaintiff to allege that a statement made was to become a term of the contract. However the circumstances of the case may be such that the plaintiff cannot be certain that the court will ...