Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Allowing these perpetrators of political polarization to stand in the way of democracy is the biggest hindrance to healthy party disagreement. [175] A concern with the increasing trend of political polarization is the social stigma stemming from either side towards their perceived opposition.
Why We're Polarized is a 2020 non-fiction book by American journalist Ezra Klein, in which the author analyzes political polarization in the United States.Focusing in particular on the growing polarization between the major political parties in the United States (the Democratic Party and the Republican Party), the author argues that a combination of good intentions gone wrong, such as dealing ...
Despite claims of political polarization, the Democratic and Republican parties are unified in their temperament and values, with both candidates moving towards centrist positions on issues such ...
A high prevalence of respectful discussions with political others may also reduce affective polarization by increasing political tolerance and inter-party trust. [34] High salience of a national common identity may also reduce affective polarization, as members of other parties are suddenly seen as in-group members.
Research suggests that people who perceived high levels of political polarization had 52 percent to 71 percent higher odds of developing a depressive or anxiety disorder.
The study found that political polarization affected the relationships of community leaders less than it did their constituents, with 36% of respondents saying community members were impacted "a ...
Political landscape is a set of hierarchies that link the political players together. In other words, political landscape is what defines relationships between colleagues at a given time. Drafting of this landscape begins with the leaders of the organization influencing the formal hierarchy ; which defines the reporting structure and indicates ...
The term was coined by Pamela Paresky [8] and promulgated by The Coddling of the American Mind, [9] which described its status as "a sacred value", meaning that it was not possible to make practical tradeoffs or compromises with other desirable things (e.g., for people to be made to feel uncomfortable in support of free speech or learning new ...