Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Moe v. Confederated Salish & Kootenai Tribes, 425 U.S. 463 (1976), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that a state tax on personal property owned by tribe members inside reservations and a state sales tax on trade between two tribe members were preempted by the General Allotment Act.
Mescalero Apache Tribe v. Jones, 411 U.S. 145 (1973), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that a state could tax tribal, off-reservation business activities but could not impose a tax on tribal land, which was exempt from all forms of property taxes.
Bryan v. Itasca County, 426 U.S. 373 (1976), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that a state did not have the right to assess a tax on the property of a Native American (Indian) living on tribal land absent a specific Congressional grant of authority to do so.
Shutterstock By Molly McCluskey For many Americans, owning a home is a large investment –- in money, in time and in a community. Fortunately, those investments can pay off at tax time, with ...
Most homeowners are familiar with the fact that mortgage interest. Source: TaxCredits.net. Editor's note: A previous version of this article incorrectly listed a tax break for manufacturers, not ...
The lawsuit was filed Friday in the Eastern District of Oklahoma.
On June 26, 1994, HUD released a new American Indian and Alaska Native policy statement, [9] emphasizing its intent to strengthen the unique government-to-government relationship between the U.S. and federally recognized Native American tribes and Alaska Native villages by encompassing Indian affairs as part of their sphere of responsibility.
Under the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, which takes effect for tax filings for the 2018 calendar year, standard deduction increases will likely mean far fewer Americans will need to itemize their returns ...