Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Murthy v. Missouri (originally filed as Missouri v. Biden) was a case in the Supreme Court of the United States involving the First Amendment, the federal government, and social media. The states of Missouri and Louisiana, led by Missouri's then Attorney General Eric Schmitt, filed suit against the U.S. government in the Western District of ...
The U.S. Supreme Court, pictured April 19, 2023, has agreed to hear a case involving the NRA and free speech.
That communication is directly at odds with a Nov. 29, 2022, deposition he gave as part of the Missouri v. Biden federal case, which the Supreme Court later rejected for lack of standing, on the ...
Categories of speech that are given lesser or no protection by the First Amendment (and therefore may be restricted) include obscenity, fraud, child pornography, speech integral to illegal conduct, speech that incites imminent lawless action, speech that violates intellectual property law, true threats, false statements of fact, and commercial ...
The unelected Andrew Bailey’s brazenly ideological investigation of Media Matters is both laughable and dangerous. | Opinion
And finally source C (NPR) says Missouri v. Biden is one of several high-profile lawsuits targeting the Biden administration. The implied conclusion is that Missouri v. Biden was designed to bolster Schmitt's campaign - but that is a conclusion not stated in any of the sources, and thus clear SYNTH.
For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 more ways to reach us
This category includes court cases that deal with the Free Speech Clause of the First Amendment to the United States Constitution, providing that "Congress shall make no law . . . abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."