enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Kelo v. City of New London - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kelo_v._City_of_New_London

    Kelo v. City of New London, 545 U.S. 469 (2005), [1] was a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of the United States in which the Court held, 5–4, that the use of eminent domain to transfer land from one private owner to another private owner to further economic development does not violate the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment.

  3. Berman v. Parker - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Berman_v._Parker

    Berman v. Parker, 348 U.S. 26 (1954), is a landmark decision of the United States Supreme Court that interpreted the Takings Clause ("nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation") of the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution.

  4. Federal Power Commission v. Tuscarora Indian Nation

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_Power_Commission_v...

    Federal Power Commission v. Tuscarora Indian Nation, 362 U.S. 99 (1960), was a case decided by the United States Supreme Court that determined that the Federal Power Commission was authorized to take lands owned by the Tuscarora Indian tribe by eminent domain under the Federal Power Act for a hydroelectric power project, upon payment of just compensation.

  5. Supreme Court Can Protect Property Owners From Eminent Domain ...

    www.aol.com/news/supreme-court-protect-property...

    The U.S. Supreme Court invited such abuses with its 2005 ruling in Kelo v. City of New London , which blessed the use of eminent domain to promote economic development by transferring property ...

  6. Georgia property owners battle railroad company in ongoing ...

    www.aol.com/news/georgia-property-owners-battle...

    A hearing on Tuesday raised questions about a railroad company’s use of eminent domain in one of Georgia’s poorest areas. After three days of hearings in November, an officer for the Georgia ...

  7. Georgia property owners battle railroad company in ongoing ...

    lite-qa.aol.com/pf/story/0001/20240806/4f2cc7a2b...

    ATLANTA (AP) — A hearing on Tuesday raised questions about a railroad company’s use of eminent domain in one of Georgia’s poorest areas. After three days of hearings in November, an officer for the Georgia Public Service Commission granted Sandersville Railroad Co.'s request to legally condemn nine properties in Sparta, Georgia.

  8. Eminent domain in the United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eminent_domain_in_the...

    An expansive interpretation of eminent domain was reaffirmed in Berman v. Parker (1954), in which the U.S. Supreme Court reviewed an effort by the District of Columbia to take and raze blighted structures in order to eliminate slums in the Southwest Washington area. After the taking, held the court, the taken and razed land could be transferred ...

  9. Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, Inc. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georgia_v._Public.Resource...

    The state assembly of Georgia appealed this decision to the United States Supreme Court. Both PRO and the state of Georgia urged the Supreme Court to grant certiorari to the government's appeal; on June 24, 2019, the Supreme Court agreed to review the case (No. 18-1150). [7] [14] [15] [16] The Court heard oral arguments in the case on December ...