Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
A set is Dedekind-finite if it is not Dedekind-infinite (i.e., no such bijection exists). Proposed by Dedekind in 1888, Dedekind-infiniteness was the first definition of "infinite" that did not rely on the definition of the natural numbers. [1] A simple example is , the set of natural numbers.
However, over a Dedekind domain the ideal class group is the only obstruction, and the structure theorem generalizes to finitely generated modules over a Dedekind domain with minor modifications. There is still a unique torsion part, with a torsionfree complement (unique up to isomorphism), but a torsionfree module over a Dedekind domain is no ...
Chapters 1 to 4 cover similar ground to Gauss' Disquisitiones Arithmeticae, and Dedekind added footnotes which specifically cross-reference the relevant sections of the Disquisitiones. These chapters can be thought of as a summary of existing knowledge, although Dirichlet simplifies Gauss's presentation, and introduces his own proofs in some ...
In mathematics, the Dedekind numbers are a rapidly growing sequence of integers named after Richard Dedekind, who defined them in 1897. [1] The Dedekind number M ( n ) {\displaystyle M(n)} is the number of monotone Boolean functions of n {\displaystyle n} variables.
A Dedekind domain can also be characterized in terms of homological algebra: an integral domain is a Dedekind domain if and only if it is a hereditary ring; that is, every submodule of a projective module over it is projective. Similarly, an integral domain is a Dedekind domain if and only if every divisible module over it is injective. [3]
When S is finite, its completion is also finite, and has the smallest number of elements among all finite complete lattices containing S. [ 12 ] The partially ordered set S is join-dense and meet-dense in the Dedekind–MacNeille completion; that is, every element of the completion is a join of some set of elements of S , and is also the meet ...
The Dedekind-Kummer theorem holds more generally than in the situation of number fields: Let be a Dedekind domain contained in its quotient field , / a finite, separable field extension with = [] for a suitable generator and the integral closure of .
If one takes the multiplication table of a finite group G and replaces each entry g with the variable x g, and subsequently takes the determinant, then the determinant factors as a product of n irreducible polynomials, where n is the number of conjugacy classes. Moreover, each polynomial is raised to a power equal to its degree.