enow.com Web Search

  1. Ads

    related to: hold harmless statement liability or asset protection

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Indemnity - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indemnity

    The duty to indemnify is usually, but not always, coextensive with the contractual duty to "hold harmless" or "save harmless". In contrast, a " guarantee " is an obligation of one party (the guarantor ) to another party to perform the promise of a relevant other party if that other party defaults .

  3. Asset protection - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asset_protection

    Asset protection (sometimes also referred to as debtor-creditor law) is a set of legal techniques and a body of statutory and common law dealing with protecting assets of individuals and business entities from civil money judgments. The goal of asset protection planning is to insulate assets from claims of creditors without perjury or tax ...

  4. Property Rules, Liability Rules and Inalienability: One View ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Property_Rules,_Liability...

    Property Rules, Liability Rules and Inalienability: One View of the Cathedral is an article in the scholarly legal literature (Harvard Law Review, Vol.85, p. 1089, April 1972), authored by Judge Guido Calabresi (of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit) and A. Douglas Melamed, currently a professor at Stanford Law School.

  5. Legal liability - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legal_liability

    A limited liability form separates the owner(s) from the business. The limited liability form essentially acts as a corporate veil that protects owners from liabilities of the business. [2] This means that when a business is found liable in a case, the owners are not themselves liable; rather, the business is.

  6. Escrow - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Escrow

    An escrow is a contractual arrangement in which a third party (the stakeholder or escrow agent) receives and disburses money or property for the primary transacting parties, with the disbursement dependent on conditions agreed to by the transacting parties.

  7. Caparo Industries plc v Dickman - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caparo_Industries_plc_v...

    The third part of the test in Caparo—whether the extension of liability is "fair, just and reasonable" (commonly known as policy considerations)—has been of relevance in a variety of contexts including controversial "wrongful conception" claims, and cases regarding the extent of liability that should be imposed on emergency services.

  1. Ads

    related to: hold harmless statement liability or asset protection