Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
String theorist Lubos Motl referred to the website as a "very promising competition [to Physics Stack Exchange]". [ 21 ] The University of Stavanger 's cosmology department commented that PhysicsOverflow "seems to implement some interesting ideas", and that "it makes some sense the [ sic ] review the reviewing process".
Stack Exchange uses IIS, SQL Server, [61] and the ASP.NET framework, [61] all from a single code base for every Stack Exchange site (except Area 51, which runs off a fork of the Stack Overflow code base). [62] Blogs formerly used WordPress, but they have been discontinued. [63] The team also uses Redis, HAProxy and Elasticsearch. [61]
The terms "free", "subscription", and "free & subscription" will refer to the availability of the website as well as the journal articles used. Furthermore, some programs are only partly free (for example, accessing abstracts or a small number of items), whereas complete access is prohibited (login or institutional subscription required).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Physics_Stack_Exchange&oldid=1105106393"
In cases where self-published material has been published by a professional researcher or other expert in the field, a source published in one of these media may be considered reliable in some cases. Trivia on sites such as IMDb or FunTrivia should not be used as sources. These media do not have adequate levels of editorial oversight or author ...
Physics Forums is a question and answer Internet forum that allows users to ask, answer and comment on grade-school through graduate-level science questions. In addition, Physics Forums hosts the Insights Blog which is a collaborative blog sourced from verified experts on the community.
This strong market position generates substantial cash flows that support shareholder returns. Turning to the specifics, the pharmaceutical giant offers investors a 4.3% dividend yield backed by a ...
This page in a nutshell: Cite reviews, don't write them. Appropriate sources for discussing the natural sciences include comprehensive reviews in independent, reliable published sources, such as recent peer reviewed articles in reputable scientific journals, statements and reports from reputable expert bodies, widely recognized standard textbooks written by experts in a field, or standard ...