enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Michigan v. Summers - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michigan_v._Summers

    Michigan v. Summers , 452 U.S. 692 (1981), was a 6–3 decision by the United States Supreme Court which held for Fourth Amendment purposes, a warrant to search for contraband founded on probable cause implicitly carries with it the limited authority to detain the occupants of the premises while a proper search is conducted.

  3. Civil forfeiture in the United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civil_forfeiture_in_the...

    All proceeds go to law enforcement. [46] Alaska Property owner needs to prove by preponderance of the evidence that the property at stake is not connected to a crime. [47] 3rd party owners need to prove their own innocence. [47] Up to 75% of proceeds go to law enforcement, and 100% for non-monetary property worth $5,000 or less. [47] Arizona

  4. Michigan Department of State Police v. Sitz - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michigan_Department_of...

    Michigan Dept. of State Police v. Sitz , 496 U.S. 444 (1990), was a United States Supreme Court case involving the constitutionality of police sobriety checkpoints . The Court held 6-3 that these checkpoints met the Fourth Amendment standard of "reasonable search and seizure."

  5. Police Cannot Seize Property Indefinitely After an Arrest ...

    www.aol.com/news/police-cannot-seize-property...

    The plaintiffs each had their property seized by D.C.'s Metropolitan Police Department (MPD). Five of the plaintiffs were arrested during a Black Lives Matter protest in the Adams Morgan ...

  6. Asset forfeiture - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asset_forfeiture

    Asset forfeiture or asset seizure is a form of confiscation of assets by the authorities.In the United States, it is a type of criminal-justice financial obligation.It typically applies to the alleged proceeds or instruments of crime.

  7. Former Michigan police chief pleads guilty to drug possession

    www.aol.com/news/former-michigan-police-chief...

    For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 more ways to reach us

  8. Hudson v. Michigan - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hudson_v._Michigan

    Hudson v. Michigan, 547 U.S. 586 (2006), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that a violation of the Fourth Amendment requirement that police officers knock, announce their presence, and wait a reasonable amount of time before entering a private residence (the knock-and-announce requirement) does not require suppression of the evidence obtained in the ensuing search.

  9. Detroit police confiscate weapons, make arrests in illegal ...

    www.aol.com/detroit-police-confiscate-weapons...

    Detroit police are continuing to crack down on illegal block parties across the city, an initiative announced in the aftermath of a mass block party shooting July 7, police department officials ...

  1. Related searches confiscation of property by police chief in michigan law enforcement mcoles

    michigan state police casemichigan state police 496 444
    michigan state department of police