enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Academic studies about Wikipedia - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Academic_studies_about...

    Research topics have included the reliability of the encyclopedia and various forms of systemic bias; social aspects of the Wikipedia community (including administration, policy, and demographics); the encyclopedia as a dataset for machine learning; and whether Wikipedia trends might predict or influence human behaviour.

  3. Wikipedia:Wikipedia in research - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/.../Wikipedia:Wikipedia_in_research

    Wikipedia has been the center of a much heated and critical debate in academia pertaining to the relevance, accuracy, and effectiveness of using information found online in academic research, especially in places where information is constantly being created, revised, and deleted by people of various backgrounds, ranging from experts to curious learners.

  4. Wikipedia:Researching with Wikipedia - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Researching_with...

    Wikipedia, like other encyclopedias, is intended to provide an overview of topics and indicate sources of more extensive and academic information. Many of the general rules of thumb for conducting research apply to Wikipedia, including:

  5. Wikipedia:List of academic studies about Wikipedia - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:List_of_academic...

    "The sum of all human knowledge": A systematic review of scholarly research on the content of Wikipedia: 2015-02 academic studies about Wikipedia Wikipedia English Wikipedia systematic review: Wikipedia in the eyes of its beholders: A systematic review of scholarly research on Wikipedia readers and readership: 2014-07-08

  6. Wikipedia:Research - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Research

    These results also yield important knowledge applicable to other open content communities. In addition to driving scholarly knowledge of such systems, this work can also give results that can improve Wikipedia itself. Much valuable research cannot be done without Wikipedia community members who volunteer to participate in studies.

  7. Wikipedia:Wikipedia as an academic source - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_as_an...

    This is notable for being an actual Wikipedia article that went through a peer-review process and was published in an academic journal, rather than being a paper based on Wikipedia article(s). Koo M (2014). "Complementary and Alternative Medicine on Wikipedia: Opportunities for Improvement". Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine.

  8. Wikipedia:Academic use - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Academic_use

    Wikipedia is not a reliable source for academic writing or research. Wikipedia is increasingly used by people in the academic community, from first-year students to distinguished professors, as an easily accessible tertiary source for information about anything and everything and as a quick "ready reference", to get a sense of a concept or idea.

  9. Wikipedia:Research help - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Research_help

    Wikipedia's scope includes all human knowledge, so we have articles about topics as diverse as science, local history, and popular culture. Volunteers write Wikipedia articles as summaries of the best information on a topic, by summarizing the information found in reliable publications .