enow.com Web Search

Search results

1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network

2. Collins v. Virginia - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Collins_v._Virginia

   Collins v. Virginia, No. 16-1027, 584 U.S. ___ (2018), was a case before the Supreme Court of the United States involving search and seizure. At issue was whether the Fourth Amendment's motor vehicle exception permits a police officer uninvited and without a warrant to enter private property, approach a house, and search a vehicle parked a few feet from the house that is otherwise visible from ...

3. Warrantless searches in the United States - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warrantless_searches_in...

   Warrantless searches are searches and seizures conducted without court-issued search warrants.. In the United States, warrantless searches are restricted under the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution, part of the Bill of Rights, which states, "The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not ...

4. Searches incident to a lawful arrest - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Searches_incident_to_a...

   Search incident to a lawful arrest, commonly known as search incident to arrest (SITA) or the Chimel rule (from Chimel v.California), is a U.S. legal principle that allows police to perform a warrantless search of an arrested person, and the area within the arrestee’s immediate control, in the interest of officer safety, the prevention of escape, and the preservation of evidence.

5. Kentucky police fatally shoot man after allegedly serving ...

   www.aol.com/kentucky-police-fatally-shoot-man...

   Police in Kentucky fatally shot a man after they allegedly served a search warrant at the wrong home earlier this week, new details reveal. Doug Harless, 61, was shot and killed on December 23 ...

6. Kentucky v. King - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kentucky_v._King

   Kentucky v. King, 563 U.S. 452 (2011), was a decision by the US Supreme Court, which held that warrantless searches conducted in police-created exigent circumstances do not violate the Fourth Amendment as long as the police did not create the exigency by violating or threatening to violate the Fourth Amendment.

7. Knock and talk - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Knock_and_talk

   North Carolina, the use of deception to obtain consent can also in some cases prevent the search from being upheld. [citation needed] Per Kentucky v. King, when a police officer who is not armed with a search warrant knocks on a door and requests the opportunity to speak, the occupant has no obligation to open the door or to speak. [4]

8. At least 1 officer killed, others wounded while serving ... - AOL

   www.aol.com/injuries-reported-police-respond...

   For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 more ways to reach us

9. AOL Mail

   mail.aol.com

   Get AOL Mail for FREE! Manage your email like never before with travel, photo & document views. Personalize your inbox with themes & tabs. You've Got Mail!