Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The costs k 1, k 2 are the variable costs of the two outputs which need to be determined. k I represents the known variable costs of the input. K var denotes the respective sum of the variable costs. a 1 and a 2 are the allocation factors for the respective output, i.e. they describe the proportion of the input that is assigned to a co-product.
For example, the CIO may provide all IT services within the company and assign the costs back to the business units that consume each offering. The core components of a cost allocation system consist of a way to track which organizations provides a product and/or service, the organizations that consume the products and/or services, and a list ...
Where products use common resources differently, some sort of weighting is needed in the cost allocation process. The cost driver is a factor that creates or drives the cost of the activity. For example, the cost of the activity of bank tellers can be ascribed to each product by measuring how long each product's transactions (cost driver) take ...
This Sustainability Framework [7] highlights RCA under the sub-heading Improving Information Flows to Support Decision and informs readers that proper cost allocation can be built ‘directly into the cost accounting system’, thereby enhancing an organization's performance for "identifying, defining and classifying costs in a useful way". [6]
The difference between the cost of an inventory calculated under the FIFO and LIFO methods is called the LIFO reserve (in the example above, it is $750, i.e. $5250 - $4500). This reserve, a form of contra account , is essentially the amount by which an entity's taxable income has been deferred by using the LIFO method.
Purchase price allocations are performed in conformity with the purchase method of merger and acquisition accounting. In the United States, a second method (known as the pooling or pooling-of-interests method) was discontinued after the issuance of the Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 141 “Business Combinations” (“ SFAS 141 ...
The UVA method is not a method of cost allocation. [7] In management accounting, one “cuts up” the whole (= the company) into “pieces” (sections/centres of analysis/activities). Then in the same way, all the expenses are discharged/allocated to each portion that was cut out. This approach may be described as “cost allocation” [as ...
It is the cost accountant's job to trace these costs back to a certain product or process (cost object) during production. Some costs cannot be traced back to a single cost object. Some costs benefit more than one product or process in the manufacturing process. These costs are called joint costs. [1]