Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Wikipedia is a great place to start. Wikipedia is not paper , and that is a good thing because articles are not strictly limited in size as they are with paper encyclopedias. Articles steadily become more polished as they develop, particularly if one person is working on an article with reasonable regularity (inclining others to help the ...
The false information lasted for six years and was propagated by hundreds of websites, several newspapers, and even a few books published by university presses. [1] [2] The reliability of Wikipedia and its volunteer-driven and community-regulated editing model, particularly its English-language edition, has been questioned and tested.
The number of Wikipedia articles grew exponentially from October 2002 to October 2006. By 2009, new article growth had become logarithmic. [4]Currently the Wikipedia has over 6,926,315 articles, making it the largest encyclopedia ever assembled, eclipsing even the Yongle Encyclopedia (completed in 1408), which held the record for nearly 600 years. [5]
The Great Book of Knowledge, Part 1, Ideas ... journal article on economics was more likely to be true after a not so long think I would opt for Wikipedia." He ...
See also why Wikipedia is so great. Learning to write in a neutral point of view is a useful intellectual exercise, since it requires cultivating humility and respect for the views of others. Wikipedia is a remarkable phenomenon of social organization; learning how things work here provides valuable lessons for many other kinds of organizations.
For that matter, Even books can be inaccurate. However, Wikipedia has a LOT of people writing it, so if something seems messed up, it will be removed or verified quickly. If you truly think that all other sites on the internet are mature, Wikipedia excluded, please go to the page mentioned here
Ten things you may not know about Wikipedia is a list of insights about Wikipedia specifically targeted at people who have limited or no prior experience with the project (such as journalists, new editors, and new readers). These explanations should not surprise experienced editors but will hopefully help the rest of the world to shape an ...
Not least in articles about Why Wikipedia is not so great which by no means reflect all the Wikipedia:Criticisms that qualified people have levied on it. Similarly, fanatical or ignorant users adhering to generally good rules to Wikipedia:avoid self-references and Wikipedia:Redirects have failed to recognize the few places where these are in ...