enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Lentz's algorithm - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lentz's_algorithm

    The idea was introduced in 1973 by William J. Lentz [1] and was simplified by him in 1982. [4] Lentz suggested that calculating ratios of spherical Bessel functions of complex arguments can be difficult. He developed a new continued fraction technique for calculating the ratios of spherical Bessel functions of consecutive order.

  3. Clearing denominators - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clearing_denominators

    The simplified equation is not entirely equivalent to the original. For when we substitute y = 0 and z = 0 in the last equation, both sides simplify to 0, so we get 0 = 0 , a mathematical truth. But the same substitution applied to the original equation results in x /6 + 0/0 = 1 , which is mathematically meaningless .

  4. Greedy algorithm for Egyptian fractions - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greedy_algorithm_for...

    The simplest fraction3 / y ⁠ with a three-term expansion is ⁠ 3 / 7 ⁠. A fraction ⁠ 4 / y ⁠ requires four terms in its greedy expansion if and only if y ≡ 1 or 17 (mod 24), for then the numerator −y mod x of the remaining fraction is 3 and the denominator is 1 (mod 6). The simplest fraction ⁠ 4 / y ⁠ with a four-term ...

  5. Egyptian fraction - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Egyptian_fraction

    In the rare case that these other methods all fail, Fibonacci suggests a "greedy" algorithm for computing Egyptian fractions, in which one repeatedly chooses the unit fraction with the smallest denominator that is no larger than the remaining fraction to be expanded: that is, in more modern notation, we replace a fraction ⁠ x / y ⁠ by the ...

  6. Irreducible fraction - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irreducible_fraction

    For example, ⁠ 1 / 4 ⁠, ⁠ 5 / 6 ⁠, and ⁠ −101 / 100 ⁠ are all irreducible fractions. On the other hand, ⁠ 2 / 4 ⁠ is reducible since it is equal in value to ⁠ 1 / 2 ⁠, and the numerator of ⁠ 1 / 2 ⁠ is less than the numerator of ⁠ 2 / 4 ⁠. A fraction that is reducible can be reduced by dividing both the numerator ...

  7. Summation by parts - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Summation_by_parts

    [2] Summation by parts is frequently used to prove Abel's theorem and Dirichlet's test . One can also use this technique to prove Abel's test : If ∑ n b n {\textstyle \sum _{n}b_{n}} is a convergent series , and a n {\displaystyle a_{n}} a bounded monotone sequence , then S N = ∑ n = 0 N a n b n {\textstyle S_{N}=\sum _{n=0}^{N}a_{n}b_{n ...

  8. Continued fraction factorization - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Continued_fraction...

    [2] The continued fraction method is based on Dixon's factorization method. It uses convergents in the regular continued fraction expansion of , +. Since this is a quadratic irrational, the continued fraction must be periodic (unless n is square, in which case the factorization is obvious).

  9. File:Partial Fraction.pdf - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Partial_Fraction.pdf

    You are free: to share – to copy, distribute and transmit the work; to remix – to adapt the work; Under the following conditions: attribution – You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made.