enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Wikipedia:Content assessment - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Content_assessment

    Higher ratings require more formal processes and consensus. The following system is used to assess the quality of a Wikipedia article. The system is based on a letter scheme that reflects principally how factually complete the article is, though language quality and layout are also factors. The quality assessments are mainly performed by ...

  3. Wikipedia : WikiProject WikiFundi Content/Help:Evaluating ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject...

    First, if it's a new article, let's look at how to add a References section to the article using WikiCode. You can access WikiCode through the "Edit source" option on the page. Then, follow these instructions: Check that the bottom of the page has a "Notes" or "References" section. If not, type: ==Notes== Check that the Notes section either has ...

  4. Wikipedia:Evaluating sources - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Evaluating_sources

    Sources of information are commonly categorized as primary, secondary, or tertiary sources.In brief, a primary source is one close to the event with firsthand knowledge (for example, an eyewitness); a secondary source is at least one step removed (for example, a book about an event written by someone not involved in it); and a tertiary source is an encyclopaedia or textbook that provides a ...

  5. Wikipedia : Evaluating Wikipedia as an encyclopedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Evaluating...

    The scope of this essay is to evaluate Wikipedia's success or failure as an encyclopedia, using the standard accepted criteria for all encyclopedias: overall size, organization and navigation, breadth of coverage, depth of coverage, timeliness, readability, biases, and reliability. [1][2][3] Other encyclopedic criteria peculiar to Wikipedia may ...

  6. Help:How to read an article history - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:How_to_read_an...

    Each edit in the article history will contain two links ((cur) and (prev)), the edit date, the editor, and sometimes an edit summary. Sometimes, there will also be an m to designate that a particular edit was only minor. Clicking (cur) will compare the version in question with the current version, while clicking (prev) will compare that version ...

  7. CRAAP test - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CRAAP_test

    The CRAAP test is a test to check the objective reliability of information sources across academic disciplines. CRAAP is an acronym for Currency, Relevance, Authority, Accuracy, and Purpose. [1] Due to a vast number of sources existing online, it can be difficult to tell whether these sources are trustworthy to use as tools for research.

  8. Academic journal - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Academic_journal

    Content typically takes the form of articles presenting original research, review articles, or book reviews.The purpose of an academic journal, according to Henry Oldenburg (the first editor of Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society), is to give researchers a venue to "impart their knowledge to one another, and contribute what they can to the Grand design of improving natural ...

  9. Wikipedia:Quick guide to reviewing new articles - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Quick_guide_to...

    WP:QG. WP:QGRNA. This page contains short guides and advice for reviewing various types of articles as part of new pages patrol. Where the main instructions page focuses on a mechanical view of how to process an article, this page summarizes key things to look out for on specific types of articles, as well as resources and likely outcomes.