enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Wikipedia:Content assessment - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Content_assessment

    The following system is used to assess the quality of a Wikipedia article. The system is based on a letter scheme that reflects principally how factually complete the article is, though language quality and layout are also factors. The quality assessments are mainly performed by Wikipedia editors, who tag Talk pages of articles; some bots set ...

  3. Wikipedia : WikiProject WikiFundi Content/Help:Evaluating ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject...

    First, if it's a new article, let's look at how to add a References section to the article using WikiCode. You can access WikiCode through the "Edit source" option on the page. Then, follow these instructions: Check that the bottom of the page has a "Notes" or "References" section. If not, type: ==Notes== Check that the Notes section either has ...

  4. Template : Dashboard.wikiedu.org evaluate article/guide

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Dashboard.wikiedu...

    Examples of good feedback. A good article evaluation can take a number of forms. The most essential things are to clearly identify the biggest shortcomings, and provide specific guidance on how the article can be improved. Peer review of this article about a famous painting.

  5. Wikipedia:Evaluating sources - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Evaluating_sources

    Sources of information are commonly categorized as primary, secondary, or tertiary sources.In brief, a primary source is one close to the event with firsthand knowledge (for example, an eyewitness); a secondary source is at least one step removed (for example, a book about an event written by someone not involved in it); and a tertiary source is an encyclopaedia or textbook that provides a ...

  6. Help:How to read an article history - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:How_to_read_an...

    Each edit in the article history will contain two links ((cur) and (prev)), the edit date, the editor, and sometimes an edit summary. Sometimes, there will also be an m to designate that a particular edit was only minor. Clicking (cur) will compare the version in question with the current version, while clicking (prev) will compare that version ...

  7. File:How to evaluate a Wikipedia article.pdf - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:How_to_evaluate_a...

    File:How to evaluate a Wikipedia article.pdf. Size of this JPG preview of this PDF file: 463 × 599 pixels. Other resolutions: 185 × 240 pixels | 371 × 480 pixels | 593 × 768 pixels | 1,275 × 1,650 pixels. This is a file from the Wikimedia Commons. Information from its description page there is shown below.

  8. Template:Grading scheme - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Grading_scheme

    The code below is for customizing the template for a specific WikiProject. Fields are optional, and will default to generic examples if left blank. Specifying the Project field will link the class labels to the appropriate quality category in the given project in the format " FA -Class Project articles".

  9. Wikipedia : Wiki Ed/Butte College/English 2 (Spring 2019)

    en.wikipedia.org/.../English_2_(Spring_2019)

    Ian (Wiki Ed) Subject. English. Course dates. 2019-01-22 00:00:00 UTC – 2019-05-23 23:59:59 UTC. Approximate number of student editors. 55. Topics covered in "Being Wrong" and others of student interest with a focus on critical reading and writing. Student.