Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
United States v. Nixon, 418 U.S. 683 (1974), was a landmark decision [1] of the Supreme Court of the United States in which the Court unanimously ordered President Richard Nixon to deliver tape recordings and other subpoenaed materials related to the Watergate scandal to a federal district court.
The Supreme Court addressed executive privilege in United States v. Nixon, the 1974 case involving the demand by Watergate special prosecutor Archibald Cox that President Richard Nixon produce the audiotapes of conversations he and his colleagues had in the Oval Office of the White House in connection with criminal charges being brought against ...
United States v. Nixon (1974): In an 8–0 decision written by Chief Justice Burger, the court rejected President Nixon's claim that executive privilege protected all communications between Nixon and his advisers. The ruling was important to the Watergate scandal, and Nixon resigned weeks after the decision was delivered. Milliken v.
On July 24, 1974, in United States v. Nixon , the Court ruled unanimously (8–0) that claims of executive privilege over the tapes were void. (Then-Associate Justice William Rehnquist —who had recently been appointed to the Court by Nixon and most recently served in the Nixon Justice Department as Assistant Attorney General of the Office of ...
Meanwhile, Mr Smith is using the 1974 Supreme Court case United States v Nixon to argue that he should not be. ... United States v Nixon. The special counsel’s office is citing the second ...
An Act to protect and preserve tape recordings of conversations involving former President Richard M. Nixon and made during his tenure as President, and for other purposes. Acronyms (colloquial) PRMPA: Nicknames: Presidential Recordings and Materials Preservation Act of 1974: Enacted by: the 93rd United States Congress: Effective: December 19 ...
July 11 – President Nixon announces his nomination of United States District Court Judge Murray I. Gurfein for judge of the Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. [62] Assistant Special Watergate Prosecutor Richard Benveniste discloses the discovery of an additional gap in the recordings of White House presidential conversations. [63]
In two other landmark precedents dealing with comparable executive powers, United States v. Nixon and Trump v. Thompson , all proceedings were completed in a little over three months in both cases.