Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The feedback form starts with a simple questions, then offers a comment box. The feedback form is a blue box at the bottom of Wikipedia articles, with a simple question: "Did you find what you were looking for?” and a comments box (see example above). For now, it is only available on a small test sample on the English Wikipedia.
SpaceX is a prime example of being rad. Ah yes, the dreaded peer review. Everyone at featured article candidacy always telling you to go there, get the article polished up, and come back. Trouble is, it can be extremely difficult to get even a single comment, even for many months! Surely, there must be a better way to get comments than that.
Wikipedia's peer review is a way to receive ideas on how to improve articles that are already decent. It may be used for potential good article nominations, potential featured article candidates, or an article of any "grade" (but if the article isn't well-developed, please read here before asking for a peer review).
These reviews were removed by Metacritic in early September, restoring the games' user scores to their original "generally favorable" and "universal acclaim" scores of 8.7 and 9.0 respectively. [25] Gears 5 was review bombed on Steam primarily by players from China after the game was pulled from sale in that region by its developer, The ...
You can find the list of all current peer reviews in different formats: a list with reviewers' comments included, a list without any reviewers' comments or a list by date. The peer review list on this page is automatically generated: please follow the steps on the instructions page to add or remove a review.
If you experience anything like this, please report the comments to us or submit feedback. If someone’s posting or spamming comments that contain racial slurs, vulgarity or anything inappropriate, please use the report feature that’s available in the comment system. To report a comment: 1. Go to the comment you are reporting. 2.
Director Robert Eggers has wanted to remake F.W. Murnau's silent horror classic for decades, but his results show a lack of imagination and too much deference to the original.
Abuses akin to ballot stuffing of favourable reviews by the seller (known as incentivized reviews), or negative reviews by competitors, need to be policed by the review host site. Indeed, gathering fake reviews has become big business. [2] In 2012, for example, fake book reviews have been revealed as significantly affecting ratings on Amazon.