Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
A court may either provide their judgment at the end of the hearing or defer the judgment to a specified date. [105] If an oral judgment is rendered, it must be read by at least one of the judges who heard the case. [106] Parties to the proceedings are entitled to receive "a certified copy of the judgement imprinted with an order of enforcement."
Court membership; Judge sitting: J.Chelameswar & Abhay Manohar Sapre: Case opinions; The Haryana Panchayati Raj (Amendment) Act, 2015 was challenged under Article 14 of the Constitution of India. The Supreme Court of India dismissed the challenge and upheld the constitutionality of the Act. Decision by: J.Chelameswar: Concurrence: Abhay Manohar ...
The Supreme Court reviewed the decision in Golaknath v. State of Punjab, and considered the validity of the article 24th, 25th, 26th and 29th amendments. The case was heard by the largest ever Constitution Bench of 13 Judges. The bench gave eleven separate judgments, which agreed in some points and differed on others. [14]
The judgement left Parliament with no power to curtail Fundamental Rights. [3] The Supreme Court, by thin majority of 6:5, held that a constitutional amendment under Article 368 of the Constitution was an ordinary 'law' within the meaning of Article 13(3) of the Constitution.
Hughes Court (February 24, 1930 – June 30, 1941) Stone Court (July 3, 1941 – April 22, 1946) Vinson Court (June 24, 1946 – September 8, 1953) Warren Court (October 5, 1953 – June 23, 1969) Burger Court (June 23, 1969 – September 26, 1986) Rehnquist Court (September 26, 1986 – September 3, 2005) Roberts Court (September 29, 2005 ...
The final judgement in the Ayodhya dispute was declared by the Supreme Court of India on 9 November 2019. [4] The Supreme Court ordered the disputed land (2.77 acres) to be handed over to a trust (to be created by the government of India) to build the Ram Janmabhoomi (revered as the birthplace of Hindu deity, Rama) temple.
Get AOL Mail for FREE! Manage your email like never before with travel, photo & document views. Personalize your inbox with themes & tabs. You've Got Mail!
"Indian Kanoon defends the right to provide access to court records". Internet Freedom Foundation. 5 January 2021. "HC asks India Kanoon to consider removing trial court judgement in matrimonial dispute". ThePrint. PTI. 29 January 2022.