Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Murray v. United States, 487 U.S. 533 (1988), was a United States Supreme Court decision that created the modern "independent source doctrine" exception to the exclusionary rule. The exclusionary rule makes most evidence gathered through violations of the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution inadmissible in criminal trials as ...
In US law, the independent source doctrine is an exception to the exclusionary rule. [1] The doctrine applies to evidence initially discovered during, or as a consequence of, an unlawful search, but later obtained independently from activities untainted by the initial illegality. [2] The United States Supreme Court, in Nix v.
Case name Citation Date decided Kansas v. Colorado: 533 U.S. 1: 2001: Kyllo v. United States: 533 U.S. 27: 2001: Tuan Anh Nguyen v. INS: 533 U.S. 53: 2001: Good News ...
1099 Murray Ave, US Bank Trust Trustee to Lambert Kristine, $84,500 ... Dolinar Joseph V to Global Real Estate Solutions LLC, $120,000. ... 533 Gentlebrook BLVD SW, $684,900. ...
This is a list of all the United States Supreme Court cases from volume 380 of the United States Reports: Udall v. Tallman, 380 U.S. 1 (1965) Singer v. United States, 380 U.S. 24 (1965) Crider v. Zurich Ins. Co., 380 U.S. 39 (1965) Freedman v. Maryland, 380 U.S. 51 (1965) United States v. Gainey, 380 U.S. 63 (1965) Carrington v. Rash, 380 U.S ...
Supreme Court of the United States 38°53′26″N 77°00′16″W / 38.89056°N 77.00444°W / 38.89056; -77.00444 Established March 4, 1789 ; 235 years ago (1789-03-04) Location Washington, D.C. Coordinates 38°53′26″N 77°00′16″W / 38.89056°N 77.00444°W / 38.89056; -77.00444 Composition method Presidential nomination with Senate confirmation Authorised by ...
Murray v. Giarratano , 492 U.S. 1 (1989), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that capital defendants do not have a constitutional right to counsel in state collateral postconviction proceedings.
The right to property, or the right to own property (cf. ownership), is often [how often?] classified as a human right for natural persons regarding their possessions.A general recognition of a right to private property is found [citation needed] more rarely and is typically heavily constrained insofar as property is owned by legal persons (i.e. corporations) and where it is used for ...