enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Predatory publishing - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Predatory_publishing

    Various journal review websites (crowd-sourced or expert-run) have been started, some focusing on the quality of the peer review process and extending to non-OA publications. [127] [128] A group of libraries and publishers launched an awareness campaign. [129] [130] A number of measures have been suggested to further combat predatory journals.

  3. Bentham Science Publishers - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bentham_Science_Publishers

    The journal's editor-in-chief Marie-Paule Pileni claimed the article was published without her authorization, and resigned. [17] In a July 2009 review of Bentham Open for The Charleston Advisor, Jeffrey Beall accused Bentham Open of exploiting the Open Access model to make quick money, and rejected that they employed any meaningful peer-review ...

  4. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Academy_of_Science...

    The World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology or WASET is a predatory publisher of open access academic journals.The publisher has been listed as a "potential, possible, or probable" predatory publisher by American library scientist Jeffrey Beall [1] and is listed as such by the Max Planck Society [2] and Stop Predatory Journals. [3]

  5. Science Publishing Group - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Science_Publishing_Group

    The company has been criticized for predatory open-access publishing. [4] [5] [6]In an experiment, university business professor Fiona McQuarrie submitted an article to International Journal of Astrophysics and Space Science from Science Publishing Group, using pseudonyms "Maggie Simpson" and "Edna Krabappel" (characters from the cartoon series The Simpsons).

  6. Scopus - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scopus

    Scopus is a scientific abstract and citation database, launched by the academic publisher Elsevier as a competitor to older Web of Science in 2004. [1] An ensuing competition between the two databases has been characterized as "intense" and is considered to significantly benefit their users in terms of continuous improvent in coverage, search/analysis capabilities, but not in price.

  7. JSciMed Central - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/JSciMed_Central

    JSciMed Central was listed in Beall's List of potential predatory open-access publishers. [4] The company has been criticized for sending out email spam to scientists, calling out for papers, [7] [8] [9] and to publish journals that have not achieved indexing in any recognized service, and were therefore considered as potential or probable predatory open-access journals.

  8. Social Science Research Network - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_Science_Research...

    On 17 May 2016, the SSRN founder and chairman Michael C. Jensen wrote a letter to the SSRN community in which he cited SSRN CEO Gregg Gordon's post on the Elsevier Connect [6] and the "new opportunities" coming from the fusion, [7] such as a broader global network and the freedom "to upload and download papers" (with more data, more resources ...

  9. Journal of Healthcare Management - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Journal_of_Healthcare...

    The Journal of Healthcare Management is a bimonthly peer-reviewed academic journal covering management in healthcare. It is published by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins on behalf of the American College of Healthcare Executives. [1] Each issue prints an interview with a leading healthcare executive.