enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Open-fields doctrine - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open-fields_doctrine

    The open-fields doctrine (also open-field doctrine or open-fields rule), in the U.S. law of criminal procedure, is the legal doctrine that a "warrantless search of the area outside a property owner's curtilage" does not violate the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution. However, "unless there is some other legal basis for the ...

  3. Social Security Fairness Act could restore benefits, but ...

    www.aol.com/social-security-fairness-act-could...

    The Windfall Elimination Provision affects people who qualify for Social Security benefits through their job but also receive a pension from another job where they didn't pay into Social Security.

  4. Oliver v. United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oliver_v._United_States

    United States, 466 U.S. 170 (1984), is a United States Supreme Court decision relating to the open fields doctrine limiting the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution. Background [ edit ]

  5. List of United States Supreme Court cases by the Rehnquist ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States...

    open fields doctrine: Immigration and Naturalization Service v. Cardoza-Fonseca: 480 U.S. 421 (1987) Asylum applicants must show "well-founded fear" of persecution to establish their eligibility Keystone Bituminous Coal Ass'n v. Debenedictus: 480 U.S. 470 (1987) substantive due process, the takings clause of the 5th Amendment: O'Connor v. Ortega

  6. After 100 Years, End the Open Fields Doctrine - AOL

    www.aol.com/news/100-years-end-open-fields...

    Federal agents are allowed to search private property without a warrant under this Prohibition-era Supreme Court precedent.

  7. Bipartisan push to eliminate Social Security rules affecting ...

    www.aol.com/news/bipartisan-group-lawmakers...

    The windfall elimination provision reduces Social Security benefits for individuals who receive pension or disability benefits from employment that did not require them to contribute payroll taxes ...

  8. Hester v. United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hester_v._United_States

    Hester v. United States, 265 U.S. 57 (1924), is a decision by the United States Supreme Court, which established the open-fields doctrine. [1] In an opinion written by Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes, the Court held that "the special protection accorded by the Fourth Amendment to the people in their 'persons, houses, papers and effects', is not extended to the open fields."

  9. Wolf v. Colorado - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wolf_v._Colorado

    Wolf v. Colorado, 338 U.S. 25 (1949), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held 6—3 that, while the Fourth Amendment was applicable to the states, the exclusionary rule was not a necessary ingredient of the Fourth Amendment's right against warrantless and unreasonable searches and seizures.

  1. Related searches open fields doctrine states that employees receive social security payments

    open fields doctrineopen fields rule wikipedia
    what is the open field rule