enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Criticism of the Bible - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criticism_of_the_Bible

    Specific collections of biblical writings, such as the Hebrew Bible and Christian Bibles, are considered sacred and authoritative by their respective faith groups. [11] The limits of the canon were effectively set by the proto-orthodox churches from the 1st throughout the 4th century; however, the status of the scriptures has been a topic of scholarly discussion in the later churches.

  3. King James Only movement - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/King_James_Only_movement

    The exclusive use of the King James Version is recorded in a statement made by the Tennessee Association of Baptists in 1817, stating "We believe that any person, either in a public or private capacity who would adhere to, or propagate any alteration of the New Testament contrary to that already translated by order of King James the 1st, that is now in common in use, ought not to be encouraged ...

  4. Biblical conspiracy theory - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biblical_conspiracy_theory

    Biblical conspiracy theories posit that much of what is believed about the Bible is a deception created to suppress a secret or ancient truth. Such conspiracy theories may claim that Jesus really had a wife and children, or that a group such as the Priory of Sion has secret information about the true descendants of Jesus; some claim that there was a secret movement to censor books that truly ...

  5. Biblical inerrancy - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biblical_inerrancy

    The idea of the word of God is more that God is encountered in scripture, than that every line of scripture is a statement made by God. [ 99 ] While the phrase "the Word of God" is never applied to the modern Bible within the Bible itself, supporters of total inerrancy argue that this is because the Biblical canon was not closed.

  6. Bible errata - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bible_errata

    Throughout history, printers' errors, unconventional translations [b] and translation mistakes have appeared in a number of published Bibles. Bibles with features considered to be erroneous are known as Bible errata , and were often destroyed or suppressed due to their contents being considered heretical by some.

  7. The Denial of the Historicity of Jesus in Past and Present

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Denial_of_the...

    Drews gives the most prominent place to David Strauss, who reduced all the supernatural events of the New Testament stories to the role of myths; and to Bruno Bauer, the first professional scholar who denied the historicity of Jesus, argued the priority of Mark as inventor of the Gospel story and the fiction of Jesus's existence, rejected all of Paul's epistles as non genuine, and emphasized ...

  8. Black History/White Lies: The 10 biggest myths about the ...

    www.aol.com/news/black-history-white-lies-10...

    OPINION: Part two of theGrio’s Black History Month series explores the myths, misunderstandings and mischaracterizations of the struggle for civil rights. The post Black History/White Lies: The ...

  9. Criticism of the Book of Mormon - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criticism_of_the_Book_of...

    The Book of Mormon claims to be the original writings of Nephite leaders in ancient America, yet it contains a mix of verbatim and paraphrased quotations of the 17th-century edition of the King James Bible (KJV) and the deuterocanonical books, which Joseph Smith's bible had as well. Furthermore, the language of the Book of Mormon closely mimics ...