Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
In 2005, the NCAA took the word "intentional" out of the rules in hopes of reducing these incidents even further. [6] Beginning with the 2013 season, players who are flagged for such hits are automatically ejected from the game in addition to a 15-yard penalty, under the new "targeting" rule, subject to a replay review.
Arvell Reese's suspension for targeting was overturned after Ohio State appealed, but the targeting rule remains controversial. What is targeting in college football? Ohio State has latest ...
The NCAA announced Thursday that its playing rules oversight panel approved several rule changes, effective the 2022 season. Most notably, players who are ejected for targeting in the second half ...
Targeting, generally defined as leading with the helmet to make forcible above-the-shoulder contact with an opponent, continues to carry with it a 15-yard penalty and the ejection of the flagged ...
As Stovall was being helped off the field, Smith announced there was no penalty, leaving Arizona State with fourth-and-5 at its own 48. If targeting had been called, a 15-yard penalty would have given the Sun Devils a first down at the Texas 37. Instead, they punted the ball away.
College football will implement several new rules this upcoming season, including one to address the targeting penalty. Under previous rules, players who were called for targeting in the second ...
An early example of an unfair act (though such a rule was not yet codified) occurred on November 23, 1918, when Navy faced the powerful Great Lakes NTS team. With Navy leading 6-0, the Midshipmen's captain Bill Ingram fumbled the ball, resulting in Harry Lawrence Eielson, of Great Lakes, picking up the ball and running it most of the way back down the field.
As a result of the targeting penalty being upheld, Indiana was also hit with a 15-yard penalty that gave Michigan an automatic first down. Johnson will be eligible to return to start Indiana's ...