enow.com Web Search

Search results

1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network

2. Wikipedia:Content assessment - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Content_assessment

   Wikipedia:Article assessment (historical), the previous version superseded by this version; Wikipedia:Assessing articles, an essay on the criteria and purpose of article assessments; Wikipedia:Metadata gadget, a script (and gadget) that finds articles' assessment information from the talk page and puts it in the article's header

3. Wikipedia:WikiProject Wikipedia/Assessment - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject...

   The ratings are done in a distributed fashion through parameters in the {{WikiProject Wikipedia}} banner; this causes the articles to be placed in the appropriate sub-categories of Category:Wikipedia articles by quality and Category:Wikipedia articles by importance, which serves as the foundation for an automatically generated worklist.

4. Wikipedia:Assessing articles - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Assessing_articles

   A Wikipedia article should not be a complete exposition of all possible details, but a summary of accepted knowledge regarding its subject." However, the guideline Wikipedia:WikiProject assessment says of the FA grade, "it neglects no major facts or details ... a definitive source for encyclopedic information." Google's list of synonyms of ...

5. Wikipedia:Reliable sources - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources

   Wikipedia articles should be based on reliable, published sources, making sure that all majority and significant minority views that have appeared in those sources are covered (see Wikipedia:Neutral point of view). If no reliable sources can be found on a topic, Wikipedia should not have an article on it.

6. Wikipedia:Peer review - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Peer_review

   Wikipedia's peer review process is a feature where an editor can receive feedback from others on how to improve an article they are working on, or receive advice about a specific issue queried by the editor. The process helps users find ways for improvement that they themselves didn't pick up on.

7. Reliability of Wikipedia - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reliability_of_Wikipedia

   Wikipedia allows anonymous editing; contributors (known as "editors") are not required to provide any identification or an email address. A 2009 study of Dartmouth College in the English Wikipedia noted that, contrary to usual social expectations, anonymous editors were some of Wikipedia's most productive contributors of valid content. [32]

8. Wikipedia:Good article nominations - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Good_article...

   A good article nomination (GAN) is a Wikipedia article that is to be evaluated against the good article criteria in order to become a good article (GA). The standard of quality for good articles is less than that for featured articles.

9. Wikipedia:Statistics - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Statistics

   Visual and audio illustration of live editing activity on Wikipedia. Pageviews Analysis: Page views GitHub: Page views statistics for several Wikipedia languages. You can select by month and the last 10, 20, 30, 60 or 90 days. WikiChecker (broken) Edits Actuality of Wikipedia based on last edits, ranking by users and pages. Edit-war detector ...