enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Comparison of distributed file systems - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_distributed...

    Some researchers have made a functional and experimental analysis of several distributed file systems including HDFS, Ceph, Gluster, Lustre and old (1.6.x) version of MooseFS, although this document is from 2013 and a lot of information are outdated (e.g. MooseFS had no HA for Metadata Server at that time).

  3. Server Message Block - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Server_Message_Block

    Likewise developed a CIFS/SMB implementation (versions 1.0, 2.0, 2.1 and NFS 3.0) in 2009 that provided a multiprotocol, identity-aware platform for network access to files used in OEM storage products built on Linux/Unix based devices. The platform could be used for traditional NAS, Cloud Gateway, and Cloud Caching devices for providing secure ...

  4. Network File System - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Network_File_System

    Network File System (NFS) is a distributed file system protocol originally developed by Sun Microsystems (Sun) in 1984, [1] allowing a user on a client computer to access files over a computer network much like local storage is accessed.

  5. Comparison of file systems - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_file_systems

    File system Stores file owner POSIX file permissions Creation timestamps Last access/ read timestamps Last metadata change timestamps Last archive timestamps Access control lists

  6. Comparison of file managers - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_file_managers

    SMB/CIFS WebDAV NFS AFP FTP FISH/SSH File features. Information on what basic file features the file managers support. File Manager Undo/redo file operation File ...

  7. OneFS distributed file system - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OneFS_distributed_file_system

    OneFS supports accessing stored files using common computer network protocols including NFS, CIFS/SMB, FTP, HTTP, and HDFS. [3] It can utilize non-local authentication such as Active Directory, LDAP, and NIS. It is capable of interfacing with external backup devices and applications that use NDMP protocol. [3]

  8. StorNext File System - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/StorNext_File_System

    Two or more DLCs can be configured for failover and/or load balancing. While DLC is an IP based protocol, it has been customized for data traffic, making it more efficient (and higher performance) than traditional NAS. In some environments, users have also used the DLC infrastructure to enable lower performance file sharing via NFS or CIFS.

  9. ONTAP - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ONTAP

    ONTAP is considered to be a unified storage system, meaning that it supports both block-level (FC, FCoE, NVMeoF and iSCSI) & file-level (NFS, pNFS, CIFS/SMB) protocols for its clients. SDS versions of ONTAP (ONTAP Select & Cloud Volumes ONTAP) do not support FC, FCoE or NVMeoF protocols due to their software-defined nature.