Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The negative slope of the indifference curve reflects the assumption of the monotonicity of consumer's preferences, which generates monotonically increasing utility functions, and the assumption of non-satiation (marginal utility for all goods is always positive); an upward sloping indifference curve would imply that a consumer is indifferent ...
At this point, the slope of the isoquant, and the slope of the isocost, will be equal (see intersection of graph D). A firm has incentive to produce at the least cost combination because it is at this point, the related costs of desired production are minimised. [9] As with indifference curves, two isoquants can never cross.
Under the standard assumption of neoclassical economics that goods and services are continuously divisible, the marginal rates of substitution will be the same regardless of the direction of exchange, and will correspond to the slope of an indifference curve (more precisely, to the slope multiplied by −1) passing through the consumption bundle in question, at that point: mathematically, it ...
Indifference curves C 1, C 2 and C 3 are shown. Each of the different points on a particular indifference curve shows a different combination of risk and return, which provide the same satisfaction to the investors. Each curve to the left represents higher utility or satisfaction. The goal of the investor would be to maximize their satisfaction ...
At this equilibrium point, the slope of the highest indifference curve must equal the slope of the production function. Recall that the marginal rate of substitution is the rate at which a consumer is ready to give up one good in exchange for another good while maintaining the same level of utility. [ 6 ]
The indifference curves are L-shaped and their corners are determined by the weights. E.g., for the function min ( x 1 / 2 , x 2 / 3 ) {\displaystyle \min(x_{1}/2,x_{2}/3)} , the corners of the indifferent curves are at ( 2 t , 3 t ) {\displaystyle (2t,3t)} where t ∈ [ 0 , ∞ ) {\displaystyle t\in [0,\infty )} .
Of the cases in BI's sample, 1,361 were argued under the deliberate-indifference standard. Only 10 plaintiffs prevailed in court; another 164 cases settled without the prison admitting liability.
Right graph: With fixed probabilities of two alternative states 1 and 2, risk averse indifference curves over pairs of state-contingent outcomes are convex. In economics and finance , risk aversion is the tendency of people to prefer outcomes with low uncertainty to those outcomes with high uncertainty, even if the average outcome of the latter ...