enow.com Web Search

  1. Ad

    related to: pros and cons of prologues of the bible text file free

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Monarchian Prologues - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monarchian_Prologues

    The prologues are, however, of no value as a historical source for the evangelists' backgrounds. They rely on the biblical text itself and various unreliable traditions as sources. [6] The earlier anti-Marcionite prologue to Luke was a source, but not the other two anti-Marcionite prologues. [7]

  3. Bible Historiale - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bible_Historiale

    Describing his own role as translating and "ordering" the text, Guyart censored or omitted portions of the Bible that "should not, according to reason, be translated", rearranged materials "so that the laity might find them better ordered" and, on occasion, added further commentaries of his own or from other sources to produce the work known as ...

  4. Anti-Marcionite prologues - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-Marcionite_Prologues

    The anti-Marcionite prologues are three short prefaces to the gospels of Mark, Luke and John. No prologue to Matthew is known. They were originally written in Greek, but only the prologue to Luke survives in the original language. All three were translated into Latin and are preserved in some 40 manuscripts of the Vulgate Bible. [2]

  5. Prooftext - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prooftext

    A proof text is a passage of scripture presented as proof for a theological doctrine, belief, or principle. [1] Prooftexting (sometimes "proof-texting" or "proof texting") is the practice of using quotations from a document, either for the purpose of exegesis , or to establish a proposition in eisegesis (introducing one's own presuppositions ...

  6. Q source - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Q_source

    For centuries, biblical scholars followed the Augustinian hypothesis: that the Gospel of Matthew was the first to be written, Mark used Matthew in the writing of his, and Luke followed both Matthew and Mark in his (the Gospel of John is quite different from the other three, which because of their similarity are called the Synoptic Gospels).

  7. Open English Bible - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_English_Bible

    The Open English Bible (OEB) is a freely redistributable modern translation based on the Twentieth Century New Testament translation. A work in progress, with its first publication in August 2010, the OEB is edited and distributed by Russell Allen.

  8. Alexandrian text-type - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alexandrian_text-type

    In textual criticism of the New Testament, the Alexandrian text-type is one of the main text types. It is the text type favored by the majority of modern textual critics and it is the basis for most modern (after 1900) Bible translations. Over 5,800 New Testament manuscripts have been classified into four groups by text type.

  9. Bible version debate - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bible_version_debate

    The Geneva Bible (1557) became the "Bible of the Puritans" and made an enormous impression on English Bible translation, second only to Tyndale. Part of this was due to its issue as a small book, an octavo size; part due to the extensive commentary; and part due to the work and endorsement of John Calvin and Theodore Beza , two of the most ...

  1. Ad

    related to: pros and cons of prologues of the bible text file free